Christie condemns NRA ad that invoked President's children (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 12:56:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Christie condemns NRA ad that invoked President's children (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Christie condemns NRA ad that invoked President's children  (Read 2058 times)
bballrox4717
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.65

« on: January 17, 2013, 10:52:49 PM »

It's gutsy; he's banking on a more sane Republican electorate in 2016. It could really backfire on him, though that chance is just as big as a total victory.
Logged
bballrox4717
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.65

« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2013, 05:17:45 PM »

Whay's so gutsy about it?  Assuming he does have presidential aspirations, what good does it do him to kowtow to the right wing in a fashion that guarantees that if he wins the nomination he'll lose the election?

Because Christie is trying to sound bipartisan and moderate when he is neither of those descriptions. Did everyone just suddenly forget how this guy was before Sandy? He wasn't even close to being bipartisan and it was pretty much agreed that we was to the right of Romney as a pretty traditional union-busting Republican.
Logged
bballrox4717
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.65

« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2013, 08:02:48 AM »

Whay's so gutsy about it?  Assuming he does have presidential aspirations, what good does it do him to kowtow to the right wing in a fashion that guarantees that if he wins the nomination he'll lose the election?

Because Christie is trying to sound bipartisan and moderate when he is neither of those descriptions. Did everyone just suddenly forget how this guy was before Sandy? He wasn't even close to being bipartisan and it was pretty much agreed that we was to the right of Romney as a pretty traditional union-busting Republican.

He's been pretty bipartisan. Has he been able to move the state in a more conservative direction? Yes, but he's worked alongside the Democratic legislature on many issues. I don't know where you saw this apparent consensus that he was a "traditional union-busting Republican" (which I assume would be along the lines of Walker/Kasich/etc), but I don't think it was here. In my opinion, Christie is more or less a moderate Republican in the same way that Huntsman is seen as one. Fiscally conservative (but not extreme), realistic foreign policy views, socially moderate (civil unions, environment, drug war, etc), and has a desire to work with Democrats in order to help his state over helping his party.

I agree that Christie was to the left of Walker/Kaisch and such but I always saw him to the right of Romney and Huntsman. I still don't see where the bipartisanship is from; he's an effective user of the bully pulpit and has always had the "my way or the highway" tone.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.