Title: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Tekken_Guy on June 05, 2019, 03:00:51 PM Who is more likely to lose re-election? Mike Parson of Missouri or Eric Holcomb of Indiana?
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Frenchrepublican on June 05, 2019, 03:37:28 PM Mike Parson because Holcomb is just incredibly popular (65% approval rate according to a poll I saw on HPI)
But both are safe R and with Trump winning both states in a landslide it’s unlikely that any race will become competitive. Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: LoneStarDem on June 05, 2019, 03:38:01 PM Neither because both are super popular.
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Politician on June 05, 2019, 03:48:32 PM Parson, obviously.
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Xing on June 05, 2019, 03:56:15 PM Voted Parson, since he'll win by less, but both of them are safe.
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Sestak on June 05, 2019, 05:54:30 PM Parson, but it would take a lot of things lining up for this to even be close to competitive.
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: We Live in Black and White on June 05, 2019, 06:05:44 PM Not that I expect either to lose, but Parson by default. Indianans love Holcomb.
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS on June 05, 2019, 06:23:50 PM The guy who underperformed Trump by 13, not the guy who underperformed Trump by 8; both while sharing a ballot with Trump.
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: SnowLabrador on June 05, 2019, 06:27:45 PM Parson. Holcomb is a relatively non-controversial figure. However, I don't expect either race to be even within single digits.
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: MT Treasurer on June 06, 2019, 03:00:08 AM Parson, because he could actually lose and MO is a lot more D-friendly down-ballot than IN. Holcomb is safe.
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: 😥 on June 06, 2019, 03:45:17 AM Not that I expect either to lose, but Parson by default. Indianans love Holcomb. Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on June 06, 2019, 05:59:52 PM Only if Galloway runs, will Parsons lose
Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Young Conservative on June 06, 2019, 08:03:53 PM Only if Galloway runs, will Parsons lose Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on June 07, 2019, 05:23:30 AM Possible Gubernatorial map
() DEL Carney inc IN Holcomb inc KY Beshear LA JBE inc MS Reeves inc seat MO N Galloway MT Fox NH M.Kelly NC R.Cooper inc ND Burgam inc UT GOP inc seat VT Scott inc WA L.Brown inc seat WVA Justice inc Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Frenchrepublican on June 07, 2019, 05:38:56 AM Possible Gubernatorial map () DEL Carney inc IN Holcomb inc KY Beshear LA JBE inc MS Reeves inc seat MO N Galloway MT Fox NH M.Kelly NC R.Cooper inc ND Burgam inc UT GOP inc seat VT Scott inc WA L.Brown inc seat WVA Justice inc If Parson is losing, which could require either a scandal or a mega democratic tsunami, dems are not losing MT Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Frenchrepublican on June 07, 2019, 05:39:58 AM Only if Galloway runs, will Parsons lose Stupid Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on June 07, 2019, 06:34:06 AM Nicole Galloway isn't McCaskill, and Sununu lost his 15 point lead to Kelly and it went down to 7.
Its possible, not probable and Jason Kander almost beat Blunt without a major scandal, in MO, in an R wave yr 2016 Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Suburbia on June 07, 2019, 12:22:33 PM Gov. Mike Parson.
Yes, Missouri is fairly pro-life, but the MO GOP is a bit too extreme. A Missouri Democrat can make it a bit competitive, but I believe both of them may win reelection. Title: Re: More vulnerable: Parson or Holcomb? Post by: Strong Candidate on June 07, 2019, 04:44:24 PM Good to see the board actually making some reasonable and well-founded analysis here.
|