Talk Elections

Atlas Fantasy Elections => Atlas Fantasy Government => Topic started by: Dr. MB on November 21, 2018, 04:18:36 PM



Title: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on November 21, 2018, 04:18:36 PM
Quote
EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT OF 2018

SENATE BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to establish an efficient system to enable employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to provide for mandatory injunctions for unfair labor practices during organizing efforts, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by both houses of Congress assembled:
Quote
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Employee Free Choice Act of 2018”.

SECTION 2. STREAMLINING UNION CERTIFICATION.

(1) In General.—Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act  is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, whenever a petition shall have been filed by an employee or group of employees or any individual or labor organization acting in their behalf alleging that a majority of employees in a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining wish to be represented by an individual or labor organization for such purposes, the Board shall investigate the petition. If the Board finds that a majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for bargaining has signed valid authorizations designating the individual or labor organization specified in the petition as their bargaining representative and that no other individual or labor organization is currently certified or recognized as the exclusive representative of any of the employees in the unit, the Board shall not direct an election but shall certify the individual or labor organization as the representative described in subsection (a).

“(7) The Board shall develop guidelines and procedures for the designation by employees of a bargaining representative in the manner described in paragraph (6). Such guidelines and procedures shall include—

    “(A) model collective bargaining authorization language that may be used for purposes of making the designations described in paragraph (6); and

    “(B) procedures to be used by the Board to establish the validity of signed authorizations designating bargaining representatives.”.

(2) Conforming Amendments.—

    (a) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.—Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended, in the second sentence—

        (A) by striking “and to” and inserting “to”; and

        (B) by striking “and certify the results thereof,” and inserting “, and to issue certifications as provided for in that section,”.

    (b) UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES.—Section 8(b) of the National Labor Relations Act  is amended—

        (A) in paragraph (7)(B) by striking “, or” and inserting “or a petition has been filed under section 9(c)(6), or”; and

        (B) in paragraph (7)(C) by striking “when such a petition has been filed” and inserting “when such a petition other than a petition under section 9(c)(6) has been filed”.

SECTION 3. FACILITATING INITIAL COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS.

Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(h) Whenever collective bargaining is for the purpose of establishing an initial agreement following certification or recognition, the provisions of subsection (d) shall be modified as follows:

    “(1) Not later than 10 days after receiving a written request for collective bargaining from an individual or labor organization that has been newly organized or certified as a representative as defined in section 9(a), or within such further period as the parties agree upon, the parties shall meet and commence to bargain collectively and shall make every reasonable effort to conclude and sign a collective bargaining agreement.

    “(2) If after the expiration of the 90-day period beginning on the date on which bargaining is commenced, or such additional period as the parties may agree upon, the parties have failed to reach an agreement, either party may notify the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service of the existence of a dispute and request mediation. Whenever such a request is received, it shall be the duty of the Service promptly to put itself in communication with the parties and to use its best efforts, by mediation and conciliation, to bring them to agreement.

    “(3) If after the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the request for mediation is made under paragraph (2), or such additional period as the parties may agree upon, the Service is not able to bring the parties to agreement by conciliation, the Service shall refer the dispute to an arbitration board established in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the Service. The arbitration panel shall render a decision settling the dispute and such decision shall be binding upon the parties for a period of 2 years, unless amended during such period by written consent of the parties.”.

SECTION 4. STRENGTHENING ENFORCEMENT.

(1) Injunctions Against Unfair Labor Practices During Organizing Drives.—

    (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10(l) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended—

        (A) in the second sentence, by striking “If, after such” and inserting the following:

“(2) If, after such”; and

        (B) by striking the first sentence and inserting the following:

“(1) Whenever it is charged—

    “(A) that any employer—

        “(i) discharged or otherwise discriminated against an employee in violation of subsection (a)(3) of section 8;

        “(ii) threatened to discharge or to otherwise discriminate against an employee in violation of subsection (a)(1) of section 8; or

        “(iii) engaged in any other unfair labor practice within the meaning of subsection (a)(1) that significantly interferes with, restrains, or coerces employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7;

     while employees of that employer were seeking representation by a labor organization or during the period after a labor organization was recognized as a representative defined in section 9(a) until the first collective bargaining contract is entered into between the employer and the representative; or

        “(B) that any person has engaged in an unfair labor practice within the meaning of subparagraph (A), (B) or (C) of section 8(b)(4), section 8(e), or section 8(b)(7);

     the preliminary investigation of such charge shall be made forthwith and given priority over all other cases except cases of like character in the office where it is filed or to which it is referred.”.

    (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 10(m) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by inserting “under circumstances not subject to section 10(l)” after “section 8”.

    (B) Remedies For Violations.—

    (1) BACKPAY.—Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by striking “And provided further,” and inserting “Provided further, That if the Board finds that an employer has discriminated against an employee in violation of subsection (a)(3) of section 8 while employees of the employer were seeking representation by a labor organization, or during the period after a labor organization was recognized as a representative defined in subsection (a) of section 9 until the first collective bargaining contract was entered into between the employer and the representative, the Board in such order shall award the employee back pay and, in addition, 2 times that amount as liquidated damages: Provided further,”.

    (2) CIVIL PENALTIES.—Section 12 of the National Labor Relations Act is amended—

        (A) by striking “Any” and inserting “(a) Any”; and

        (B) by adding at the end the following:


    “(b) Any employer who willfully or repeatedly commits any unfair labor practice within the meaning of subsections (a)(1) or (a)(3) of section 8 while employees of the employer are seeking representation by a labor organization or during the period after a labor organization has been recognized as a representative defined in subsection (a) of section 9 until the first collective bargaining contract is entered into between the employer and the representative shall, in addition to any make-whole remedy ordered, be subject to a civil penalty of not to exceed $20,000 for each violation. In determining the amount of any penalty under this section, the Board shall consider the gravity of the unfair labor practice and the impact of the unfair labor practice on the charging party, on other persons seeking to exercise rights guaranteed by this Act, or on the public interest.”.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

1. This Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

() (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=301484.msg6544430#msg6544430)


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on November 21, 2018, 04:19:04 PM
Sponsor is needed.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: JGibson on November 21, 2018, 05:19:08 PM

I am going to sponsor this bill.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on November 21, 2018, 05:27:50 PM
JGibson has requested sponsorship. 24 hours to object.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on November 21, 2018, 06:00:59 PM
I object.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on November 23, 2018, 01:08:15 PM
YoungTexan and LouisvilleThunder have objected to JGibson's sponsoring of this bill. A vote will be held for 72 hours on whether to accept sponsorship.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: JGibson on November 23, 2018, 02:42:26 PM
AYE


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Esteemed Jimmy on November 23, 2018, 02:45:54 PM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on November 23, 2018, 02:46:55 PM
Nay


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: MAINEiac4434 on November 23, 2018, 03:35:37 PM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Vern on November 23, 2018, 06:47:57 PM
abstain


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Adam Griffin on November 24, 2018, 09:35:07 AM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong on November 24, 2018, 01:40:11 PM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on November 26, 2018, 07:48:13 PM
By a vote of 5-2-1, JGibson is the sponsor of this amendment.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: JGibson on November 26, 2018, 10:23:20 PM
I rise to the floor on this very important bill facing Atlasians right now that I am sponsoring: Employee Free Choice Act, or EFCA for short, is a vital bill protecting the rights of those who wish to form a union without coercion or intimidation from their employer(s).

I urge my colleagues to vote AYE on this bill to protect the unions from intimidation!




Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong on November 26, 2018, 11:18:41 PM
I motion for a final vote


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on November 26, 2018, 11:21:39 PM
I object to the motion for a final vote.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: fhtagn on November 26, 2018, 11:23:16 PM

Seems a bit premature considering no debate has taken place on this bill. Or are you completely fine with ramming through bad bills without any debate?


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: MAINEiac4434 on November 28, 2018, 03:55:30 PM

Seems a bit premature considering no debate has taken place on this bill. Or are you completely fine with ramming through bad bills without any debate?
"bad bills"


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: fhtagn on November 28, 2018, 04:13:18 PM

Seems a bit premature considering no debate has taken place on this bill. Or are you completely fine with ramming through bad bills without any debate?
"bad bills"
Just because you don't agree with facts doesn't mean it's acceptable to skip debate on it.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong on November 28, 2018, 05:15:02 PM
Ok, I can pull the motion until other representatives feel like there has been enough debate


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Mr. Reactionary on November 28, 2018, 07:51:03 PM
Main topic for debate: if unionization is supposed to be to the benefit of the workers, what's wrong with letting all of the affected workers vote?


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong on December 10, 2018, 10:47:34 PM
Main topic for debate: if unionization is supposed to be to the benefit of the workers, what's wrong with letting all of the affected workers vote?

I, for one, believe that union membership is a force for good in a workplace, especially in an era like ours where economic inequality is on the rise around the world. This bill will strengthen unions, and this is also why I don't believe in the "right-to-work" school of labor policy which, in my opinion, would allow employers to take advantage of their workers and cause more harm than good.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong on December 10, 2018, 10:48:52 PM
I move for a final vote


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on December 10, 2018, 10:50:34 PM
Main topic for debate: if unionization is supposed to be to the benefit of the workers, what's wrong with letting all of the affected workers vote?

I, for one, believe that union membership is a force for good in a workplace, especially in an era like ours where economic inequality is on the rise around the world. This bill will strengthen unions, and this is also why I don't believe in the "right-to-work" school of labor policy which, in my opinion, would allow employers to take advantage of their workers and cause more harm than good.
If it's so good, then why not let the workers vote to join unions. Also, not all unions provide actual benefits for them.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Mr. Reactionary on December 10, 2018, 11:45:25 PM
Main topic for debate: if unionization is supposed to be to the benefit of the workers, what's wrong with letting all of the affected workers vote?

I, for one, believe that union membership is a force for good in a workplace, especially in an era like ours where economic inequality is on the rise around the world. This bill will strengthen unions, and this is also why I don't believe in the "right-to-work" school of labor policy which, in my opinion, would allow employers to take advantage of their workers and cause more harm than good.

*My post is ONLY in my capacity as a voter and not GM*

I'm doing my best to avoid direct policy advocacy now, but I will say that your above response did not really answer my question of what's wrong with letting all of the affected workers vote first ...

Could you please try again beginning with something like: "I do not think all affected workers should vote on whether or not to unionize because [insert your answer here]"? Thanks.

*My post is ONLY in my capacity as a voter and not GM*


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on December 10, 2018, 11:48:50 PM
I object to the motion for a final vote.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on December 15, 2018, 02:47:33 PM
As there have been 2 objections on the motion for a final vote, there will be a vote held on whether to object to Razze's motion. It will run for 72 hours or until all Representatives have voted.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on December 15, 2018, 03:01:26 PM
I present an amendment.

Quote
EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT OF 2018

SENATE BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to establish an efficient system to enable employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to provide for mandatory injunctions for unfair labor practices during organizing efforts, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by both houses of Congress assembled:
Quote
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Employee Free Choice Act of 2018”.

SECTION 2. STREAMLINING UNION CERTIFICATION.

(1) In General.—Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act  is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, whenever a petition shall have been filed by an employee or group of employees or any individual or labor organization acting in their behalf alleging that a majority of employees in a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining wish to be represented by an individual or labor organization for such purposes, the Board shall investigate the petition. If the Board finds that a majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for bargaining has signed valid authorizations designating the individual or labor organization specified in the petition as their bargaining representative and that no other individual or labor organization is currently certified or recognized as the exclusive representative of any of the employees in the unit, the Board shall not direct an election but shall certify the individual or labor organization as the representative described in subsection (a).

“(7) The Board shall develop guidelines and procedures for the designation by employees of a bargaining representative in the manner described in paragraph (6). Such guidelines and procedures shall include—

    “(A) model collective bargaining authorization language that may be used for purposes of making the designations described in paragraph (6); and

    “(B) procedures to be used by the Board to establish the validity of signed authorizations designating bargaining representatives.”.

(2) Conforming Amendments.—

    (a) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.—Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended, in the second sentence—

        (A) by striking “and to” and inserting “to”; and

        (B) by striking “and certify the results thereof,” and inserting “, and to issue certifications as provided for in that section,”.

    (b) UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES.—Section 8(b) of the National Labor Relations Act  is amended—

        (A) in paragraph (7)(B) by striking “, or” and inserting “or a petition has been filed under section 9(c)(6), or”; and

        (B) in paragraph (7)(C) by striking “when such a petition has been filed” and inserting “when such a petition other than a petition under section 9(c)(6) has been filed”.


SECTION 3. FACILITATING INITIAL COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS.

Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(h) Whenever collective bargaining is for the purpose of establishing an initial agreement following certification or recognition, the provisions of subsection (d) shall be modified as follows:

    “(1) Not later than 10 days after receiving a written request for collective bargaining from an individual or labor organization that has been newly organized or certified as a representative as defined in section 9(a), or within such further period as the parties agree upon, the parties shall meet and commence to bargain collectively and shall make every reasonable effort to conclude and sign a collective bargaining agreement.

    “(2) If after the expiration of the 90-day period beginning on the date on which bargaining is commenced, or such additional period as the parties may agree upon, the parties have failed to reach an agreement, either party may notify the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service of the existence of a dispute and request mediation. Whenever such a request is received, it shall be the duty of the Service promptly to put itself in communication with the parties and to use its best efforts, by mediation and conciliation, to bring them to agreement.

    “(3) If after the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the request for mediation is made under paragraph (2), or such additional period as the parties may agree upon, the Service is not able to bring the parties to agreement by conciliation, the Service shall refer the dispute to an arbitration board established in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the Service. The arbitration panel shall render a decision settling the dispute and such decision shall be binding upon the parties for a period of 2 years, unless amended during such period by written consent of the parties.”.

SECTION 4. STRENGTHENING ENFORCEMENT.

(1) Injunctions Against Unfair Labor Practices During Organizing Drives.—

    (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10(l) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended—

        (A) in the second sentence, by striking “If, after such” and inserting the following:

“(2) If, after such”; and

        (B) by striking the first sentence and inserting the following:

“(1) Whenever it is charged—

    “(A) that any employer—

        “(i) discharged or otherwise discriminated against an employee in violation of subsection (a)(3) of section 8;

        “(ii) threatened to discharge or to otherwise discriminate against an employee in violation of subsection (a)(1) of section 8; or

        “(iii) engaged in any other unfair labor practice within the meaning of subsection (a)(1) that significantly interferes with, restrains, or coerces employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7;

     while employees of that employer were seeking representation by a labor organization or during the period after a labor organization was recognized as a representative defined in section 9(a) until the first collective bargaining contract is entered into between the employer and the representative; or

        “(B) that any person has engaged in an unfair labor practice within the meaning of subparagraph (A), (B) or (C) of section 8(b)(4), section 8(e), or section 8(b)(7);

     the preliminary investigation of such charge shall be made forthwith and given priority over all other cases except cases of like character in the office where it is filed or to which it is referred.”.

    (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 10(m) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by inserting “under circumstances not subject to section 10(l)” after “section 8”.

    (B) Remedies For Violations.—

    (1) BACKPAY.—Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by striking “And provided further,” and inserting “Provided further, That if the Board finds that an employer has discriminated against an employee in violation of subsection (a)(3) of section 8 while employees of the employer were seeking representation by a labor organization, or during the period after a labor organization was recognized as a representative defined in subsection (a) of section 9 until the first collective bargaining contract was entered into between the employer and the representative, the Board in such order shall award the employee back pay and, in addition, 2 times that amount as liquidated damages: Provided further,”.

    (2) CIVIL PENALTIES.—Section 12 of the National Labor Relations Act is amended—

        (A) by striking “Any” and inserting “(a) Any”; and

        (B) by adding at the end the following:


    “(b) Any employer who willfully or repeatedly commits any unfair labor practice within the meaning of subsections (a)(1) or (a)(3) of section 8 while employees of the employer are seeking representation by a labor organization or during the period after a labor organization has been recognized as a representative defined in subsection (a) of section 9 until the first collective bargaining contract is entered into between the employer and the representative shall, in addition to any make-whole remedy ordered, be subject to a civil penalty of not to exceed $20,000 for each violation. In determining the amount of any penalty under this section, the Board shall consider the gravity of the unfair labor practice and the impact of the unfair labor practice on the charging party, on other persons seeking to exercise rights guaranteed by this Act, or on the public interest.”.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

1. This Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

() (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=301484.msg6544430#msg6544430)


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Sestak on December 15, 2018, 03:07:00 PM
You can't just present an amendment in the middle of a cloture vote.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: fhtagn on December 15, 2018, 03:16:54 PM
I'm curious as to why Razze felt the need to motion for a final vote when debate wasn't finished, especially when he didn't actually answer the question he was asked?


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on December 15, 2018, 03:29:59 PM
You can't just present an amendment in the middle of a cloture vote.
Sure I can, because we are still debating.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Esteemed Jimmy on December 16, 2018, 05:20:39 PM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on December 16, 2018, 06:05:37 PM
This is an illegitimate vote, but Nay.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: MAINEiac4434 on December 16, 2018, 06:55:34 PM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: JGibson on December 16, 2018, 07:24:10 PM
AYE


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Vern on December 16, 2018, 09:12:17 PM
Nay.. because there is still some who want to debate this. We need to give people the time they want to debate it.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong on December 16, 2018, 11:21:00 PM
There were a few days of zero postings on this bill, but now that i've motioned for a vote, people seem to be concerned about more debate? Um

Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: YE on December 16, 2018, 11:25:21 PM
This has been debated to death back in May when the bill was first introduced and I don't think the two sides will ever agree on this issue and asking opponents questions just stalls time and scores political points. Hold a vote already and actually get something done for once.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: OSR stands with Israel on December 16, 2018, 11:32:03 PM
Nay


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Mr. Reactionary on December 16, 2018, 11:39:14 PM
This has been debated to death back in May when the bill was first introduced and I don't think the two sides will ever agree on this issue and asking opponents questions just stalls time and scores political points. Hold a vote already and actually get something done for once.

During the debate, I do not believe it was ever explained why workers should not be allowed to vote on whether or not they wish to unionize.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: fhtagn on December 16, 2018, 11:47:21 PM
Ok, I can pull the motion until other representatives feel like there has been enough debate
And you let a question sit for 12 days that you didn't actually answer.

How about we try that again, without the excuses?


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: YE on December 17, 2018, 12:07:35 AM
This has been debated to death back in May when the bill was first introduced and I don't think the two sides will ever agree on this issue and asking opponents questions just stalls time and scores political points. Hold a vote already and actually get something done for once.

During the debate, I do not believe it was ever explained why workers should not be allowed to vote on whether or not they wish to unionize.


Yes it was (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=291559.msg6198315#msg6198315) but you chose to ignore it and strawman others to try to paint the labor as anti-worker because you don't actually believe in a social safety net and rather just believe in individual liberty, which to be fair and think that somehow that'll solve all problems.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Mr. Reactionary on December 17, 2018, 07:32:09 AM
This has been debated to death back in May when the bill was first introduced and I don't think the two sides will ever agree on this issue and asking opponents questions just stalls time and scores political points. Hold a vote already and actually get something done for once.

During the debate, I do not believe it was ever explained why workers should not be allowed to vote on whether or not they wish to unionize.


Yes it was (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=291559.msg6198315#msg6198315) but you chose to ignore it and strawman others to try to paint the labor as anti-worker because you don't actually believe in a social safety net and rather just believe in individual liberty, which to be fair and think that somehow that'll solve all problems.

You mean that thing 7 months ago that like what 1 of 9 current representatives was in office for?


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: YE on December 17, 2018, 07:35:26 AM
This has been debated to death back in May when the bill was first introduced and I don't think the two sides will ever agree on this issue and asking opponents questions just stalls time and scores political points. Hold a vote already and actually get something done for once.

During the debate, I do not believe it was ever explained why workers should not be allowed to vote on whether or not they wish to unionize.


Yes it was (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=291559.msg6198315#msg6198315) but you chose to ignore it and strawman others to try to paint the labor as anti-worker because you don't actually believe in a social safety net and rather just believe in individual liberty, which to be fair and think that somehow that'll solve all problems.

You mean that thing 7 months ago that like what 1 of 9 current representatives was in office for?

I mean the same arguments used then apply now as they did then.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on December 19, 2018, 12:11:50 AM
The cloture vote has resulted in a 4-4 tie. As Vice President I am empowered to break the tie.

Aye

The cloture vote on Razze's motion has passed, 5-4.

A final vote will therefore be held. It will last 72 hours.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Vern on December 19, 2018, 10:01:32 AM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Esteemed Jimmy on December 19, 2018, 12:05:19 PM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: JGibson on December 19, 2018, 12:32:54 PM
AYE


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong on December 19, 2018, 07:18:22 PM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: MAINEiac4434 on December 19, 2018, 08:04:59 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Adam Griffin on December 19, 2018, 08:06:52 PM
Aye


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on December 19, 2018, 08:52:45 PM
Nay!


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on December 20, 2018, 07:52:55 PM
24 hours left


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on December 22, 2018, 01:14:28 AM
The bill has passed, 6-2.


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: Dr. MB on December 22, 2018, 08:09:38 PM
Quote
EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT OF 2018

SENATE BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to establish an efficient system to enable employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to provide for mandatory injunctions for unfair labor practices during organizing efforts, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by both houses of Congress assembled:
Quote
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Employee Free Choice Act of 2018”.

SECTION 2. STREAMLINING UNION CERTIFICATION.

(1) In General.—Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act  is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, whenever a petition shall have been filed by an employee or group of employees or any individual or labor organization acting in their behalf alleging that a majority of employees in a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining wish to be represented by an individual or labor organization for such purposes, the Board shall investigate the petition. If the Board finds that a majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for bargaining has signed valid authorizations designating the individual or labor organization specified in the petition as their bargaining representative and that no other individual or labor organization is currently certified or recognized as the exclusive representative of any of the employees in the unit, the Board shall not direct an election but shall certify the individual or labor organization as the representative described in subsection (a).

“(7) The Board shall develop guidelines and procedures for the designation by employees of a bargaining representative in the manner described in paragraph (6). Such guidelines and procedures shall include—

    “(A) model collective bargaining authorization language that may be used for purposes of making the designations described in paragraph (6); and

    “(B) procedures to be used by the Board to establish the validity of signed authorizations designating bargaining representatives.”.

(2) Conforming Amendments.—

    (a) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.—Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended, in the second sentence—

        (A) by striking “and to” and inserting “to”; and

        (B) by striking “and certify the results thereof,” and inserting “, and to issue certifications as provided for in that section,”.

    (b) UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES.—Section 8(b) of the National Labor Relations Act  is amended—

        (A) in paragraph (7)(B) by striking “, or” and inserting “or a petition has been filed under section 9(c)(6), or”; and

        (B) in paragraph (7)(C) by striking “when such a petition has been filed” and inserting “when such a petition other than a petition under section 9(c)(6) has been filed”.

SECTION 3. FACILITATING INITIAL COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS.

Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(h) Whenever collective bargaining is for the purpose of establishing an initial agreement following certification or recognition, the provisions of subsection (d) shall be modified as follows:

    “(1) Not later than 10 days after receiving a written request for collective bargaining from an individual or labor organization that has been newly organized or certified as a representative as defined in section 9(a), or within such further period as the parties agree upon, the parties shall meet and commence to bargain collectively and shall make every reasonable effort to conclude and sign a collective bargaining agreement.

    “(2) If after the expiration of the 90-day period beginning on the date on which bargaining is commenced, or such additional period as the parties may agree upon, the parties have failed to reach an agreement, either party may notify the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service of the existence of a dispute and request mediation. Whenever such a request is received, it shall be the duty of the Service promptly to put itself in communication with the parties and to use its best efforts, by mediation and conciliation, to bring them to agreement.

    “(3) If after the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the request for mediation is made under paragraph (2), or such additional period as the parties may agree upon, the Service is not able to bring the parties to agreement by conciliation, the Service shall refer the dispute to an arbitration board established in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the Service. The arbitration panel shall render a decision settling the dispute and such decision shall be binding upon the parties for a period of 2 years, unless amended during such period by written consent of the parties.”.

SECTION 4. STRENGTHENING ENFORCEMENT.

(1) Injunctions Against Unfair Labor Practices During Organizing Drives.—

    (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10(l) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended—

        (A) in the second sentence, by striking “If, after such” and inserting the following:

“(2) If, after such”; and

        (B) by striking the first sentence and inserting the following:

“(1) Whenever it is charged—

    “(A) that any employer—

        “(i) discharged or otherwise discriminated against an employee in violation of subsection (a)(3) of section 8;

        “(ii) threatened to discharge or to otherwise discriminate against an employee in violation of subsection (a)(1) of section 8; or

        “(iii) engaged in any other unfair labor practice within the meaning of subsection (a)(1) that significantly interferes with, restrains, or coerces employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7;

     while employees of that employer were seeking representation by a labor organization or during the period after a labor organization was recognized as a representative defined in section 9(a) until the first collective bargaining contract is entered into between the employer and the representative; or

        “(B) that any person has engaged in an unfair labor practice within the meaning of subparagraph (A), (B) or (C) of section 8(b)(4), section 8(e), or section 8(b)(7);

     the preliminary investigation of such charge shall be made forthwith and given priority over all other cases except cases of like character in the office where it is filed or to which it is referred.”.

    (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 10(m) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by inserting “under circumstances not subject to section 10(l)” after “section 8”.

    (B) Remedies For Violations.—

    (1) BACKPAY.—Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by striking “And provided further,” and inserting “Provided further, That if the Board finds that an employer has discriminated against an employee in violation of subsection (a)(3) of section 8 while employees of the employer were seeking representation by a labor organization, or during the period after a labor organization was recognized as a representative defined in subsection (a) of section 9 until the first collective bargaining contract was entered into between the employer and the representative, the Board in such order shall award the employee back pay and, in addition, 2 times that amount as liquidated damages: Provided further,”.

    (2) CIVIL PENALTIES.—Section 12 of the National Labor Relations Act is amended—

        (A) by striking “Any” and inserting “(a) Any”; and

        (B) by adding at the end the following:


    “(b) Any employer who willfully or repeatedly commits any unfair labor practice within the meaning of subsections (a)(1) or (a)(3) of section 8 while employees of the employer are seeking representation by a labor organization or during the period after a labor organization has been recognized as a representative defined in subsection (a) of section 9 until the first collective bargaining contract is entered into between the employer and the representative shall, in addition to any make-whole remedy ordered, be subject to a civil penalty of not to exceed $20,000 for each violation. In determining the amount of any penalty under this section, the Board shall consider the gravity of the unfair labor practice and the impact of the unfair labor practice on the charging party, on other persons seeking to exercise rights guaranteed by this Act, or on the public interest.”.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

1. This Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Atlasian Regional Senate
() (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=301484.msg6544430#msg6544430)

People’s House of Representatives
Passed 6-2 in the People’s House assembled (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=307464.msg6595324#msg6595324)

()


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: YE on December 22, 2018, 08:14:13 PM
Is a bill finally about to become a law? Am I reading this right?


Title: Re: HB 1351: Employee Free Choice Act
Post by: At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder on December 22, 2018, 08:26:08 PM
Is a bill finally about to become a law? Am I reading this right?
Congrats to Labor finally getting a trophy for their election victories.