|
Title: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: Miles on October 20, 2014, 08:47:21 AM Article. (http://www.bostonherald.com/sites/default/files/media/2014/10/20/NHpoll10202014.pdf)
Shaheen (D)- 49% Brown (R)- 46% Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: KCDem on October 20, 2014, 10:29:01 AM #Shaheenunder50 so Scott Brown has this locked up just like President Romney won Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida.
Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: Rockefeller GOP on October 20, 2014, 11:01:56 AM #Shaheenunder50 so Scott Brown has this locked up just like President Romney won Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida. Who said anything remotely close to that? Calm down, fanboy. Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: Recalcuate on October 20, 2014, 11:07:39 AM #Shaheenunder50 so Scott Brown has this locked up just like President Romney won Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida. Who said anything remotely close to that? Calm down, fanboy. No kidding. Anyone who is honest about the state of this race knows that it is Shaheen's to lose at this point. Problem for the red avatars is that if races like NH and NC are in legitimate play, the Senate is probably lost for them. Those are states 54 and 55 respectively, about the best the Republicans can do. Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: Lief 🗽 on October 20, 2014, 11:37:02 AM Good, good. The firewall is holding strong.
Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: MalaspinaGold on October 20, 2014, 11:55:31 AM #Shaheenunder50 so Scott Brown has this locked up just like President Romney won Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida. Who said anything remotely close to that? Calm down, fanboy. Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: Rockefeller GOP on October 20, 2014, 02:04:47 PM #Shaheenunder50 so Scott Brown has this locked up just like President Romney won Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida. Who said anything remotely close to that? Calm down, fanboy. I was referencing his straw man troll post regarding the NH race. He's acting like this forum's Republicans have been calling a Scott Brown victory for weeks. Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: KCDem on October 20, 2014, 02:24:04 PM #Shaheenunder50 so Scott Brown has this locked up just like President Romney won Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida. Who said anything remotely close to that? Calm down, fanboy. I was referencing his straw man troll post regarding the NH race. He's acting like this forum's Republicans have been calling a Scott Brown victory for weeks. No, I wasn't. Maybe if you weren't so defensive and nervous going into election night, you wouldn't be attacking me. Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: New_Conservative on October 20, 2014, 02:26:49 PM Brown clearly has momentum in New Hampshire, homering a prediction for him to win in New Hampshire, even though I don't really think he wins.
Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: IceSpear on October 20, 2014, 02:31:10 PM Against a decent candidate Shaheen would probably be sunk, but luckily the GOP nominated a carpetbagger with terrible favorability ratings, so she should be able to hang on.
Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: Torie on October 20, 2014, 02:46:44 PM Pursuant to some statistical mumbo-jumbo, if the incumbent hits 47%, it's generally a tossup race. So two points to go! :)
Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas on October 20, 2014, 03:15:48 PM Shaheen's lead is shrinking fast. The only question is, can Brown land a few body blows before the election and put this into the upset column?
Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: KCDem on October 20, 2014, 03:16:28 PM Shaheen's lead is shrinking fast. The only question is, can Brown land a few body blows before the election and put this into the upset column? Haha you're buying the hype? LOL Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: New_Conservative on October 20, 2014, 03:20:54 PM Against a decent candidate Shaheen would probably be sunk, but luckily the GOP nominated a carpetbagger with terrible favorability ratings, so she should be able to hang on. You have to at least admit he is seeing some momentum right now. It is going to be closer than we thought it was a few weeks ago. Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: IceSpear on October 20, 2014, 03:24:20 PM Against a decent candidate Shaheen would probably be sunk, but luckily the GOP nominated a carpetbagger with terrible favorability ratings, so she should be able to hang on. You have to at least admit he is seeing some momentum right now. It is going to be closer than we thought it was a few weeks ago. Yeah, he's definitely closed the gap, I'm guessing partly due to New Hampshire's schizophrenic politics. But it's a tall order for him to actually win considering these polls all have Shaheen at 48-50% of the vote (and with a positive favorability rating) and Brown's ratings are in the toilet. Title: Re: NH: Suffolk: Shaheen +3 Post by: free my dawg on October 20, 2014, 03:36:18 PM Against a decent candidate Shaheen would probably be sunk, but luckily the GOP nominated a carpetbagger with terrible favorability ratings, so she should be able to hang on. You have to at least admit he is seeing some momentum right now. It is going to be closer than we thought it was a few weeks ago. Nobody's doubting that. It's undeniably competitive, but I just think Shaheen is too close to 50 for her not to have the advantage. |