Title: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Miles on October 01, 2014, 12:24:34 PM Link. (https://twitter.com/MULawPoll/status/517364300902432769)
LVs Walker (R)- 50% Burke (D)- 45% RVs Walker- 46% Burke - 45% Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on October 01, 2014, 12:24:55 PM Well crap.
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Gass3268 on October 01, 2014, 12:29:31 PM Going to need a great GOTV.
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: RogueBeaver on October 01, 2014, 12:31:06 PM Woot. Gender gap: 62/34 Walker among men, 54/40 Burke among women. (https://twitter.com/RightWisconsin/status/517365441875156992)
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: krazen1211 on October 01, 2014, 12:31:33 PM Glorious! What a dominating performance by the great soon to be 3 time champion of the people!
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Never on October 01, 2014, 12:32:05 PM Great news! It's nice to see Walker make it to 50% in this poll.
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Gass3268 on October 01, 2014, 12:33:09 PM Woot. Gender gap: 62/34 Walker among men, 54/40 Burke among women. (https://twitter.com/RightWisconsin/status/517365441875156992) The contrast here is truly fascinating. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Maxwell on October 01, 2014, 12:34:17 PM Nah man, Marquette is a fraud, R-pollster created by Karl Rove. Polling is skewed, Burke will hand Walker his ass to him obviously.
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Miles on October 01, 2014, 12:35:27 PM Both have their parties locked up, but Walker is winning Indies 53/40.
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Gass3268 on October 01, 2014, 12:36:48 PM Both have their parties locked up, but Walker is winning Indies 53/40. Here are your Bush-Bush-Obama-Walker-Walker-Obama/Baldiwn voters. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Lief 🗽 on October 01, 2014, 12:38:43 PM RIP Burke.
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Gass3268 on October 01, 2014, 12:41:43 PM Quote MULawPoll @MULawPoll · 23s 24 seconds ago A fifth of registered voters are unaware they will need to use photo ID to vote, under recent court ruling. #mulawpoll This is going to cause chaos on election day. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: krazen1211 on October 01, 2014, 12:44:11 PM Quote MULawPoll @MULawPoll · 23s 24 seconds ago A fifth of registered voters are unaware they will need to use photo ID to vote, under recent court ruling. #mulawpoll This is going to cause chaos on election day. That's a hilarious bunch of malarkey given that champion Scott Walker signed legislation requiring such 3 years ago. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: IceSpear on October 01, 2014, 12:45:05 PM Both have their parties locked up, but Walker is winning Indies 53/40. Here are your Bush-Bush-Obama-Walker-Walker-Obama/Baldiwn voters. Baldwin is probably the funniest part of that. Imagining a Walker/Baldwin voter... Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Eraserhead on October 01, 2014, 01:04:16 PM Ugh. Oh well.
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Free Bird on October 01, 2014, 01:39:04 PM Eat it, Gravis
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Mr. Illini on October 01, 2014, 01:57:25 PM Quote MULawPoll @MULawPoll · 23s 24 seconds ago A fifth of registered voters are unaware they will need to use photo ID to vote, under recent court ruling. #mulawpoll This is going to cause chaos on election day. That's a hilarious bunch of malarkey given that champion Scott Walker signed legislation requiring such 3 years ago. The new Republican victory strategy, of course. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Lief 🗽 on October 01, 2014, 02:01:42 PM Quote MULawPoll @MULawPoll · 23s 24 seconds ago A fifth of registered voters are unaware they will need to use photo ID to vote, under recent court ruling. #mulawpoll This is going to cause chaos on election day. That's a hilarious bunch of malarkey given that champion Scott Walker signed legislation requiring such 3 years ago. hahahaha voter disenfranchisement, hilarious Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: krazen1211 on October 01, 2014, 02:19:01 PM Quote MULawPoll @MULawPoll · 23s 24 seconds ago A fifth of registered voters are unaware they will need to use photo ID to vote, under recent court ruling. #mulawpoll This is going to cause chaos on election day. That's a hilarious bunch of malarkey given that champion Scott Walker signed legislation requiring such 3 years ago. The new Republican victory strategy, of course. Hmm? Scott Walker won election before he signed the voter ID law. Then he won re-election. He is a great champion of the people but certainly not a fortune teller. There is no way that the great Scott Walker could have known back in May 2011 when he signed the voter ID law the losers and fleabaggers that he thrashed would squeal about voter ID through September 2014. The Madison moochers had 3.5 years to get an ID. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Mr. Illini on October 01, 2014, 02:27:47 PM Quote MULawPoll @MULawPoll · 23s 24 seconds ago A fifth of registered voters are unaware they will need to use photo ID to vote, under recent court ruling. #mulawpoll This is going to cause chaos on election day. That's a hilarious bunch of malarkey given that champion Scott Walker signed legislation requiring such 3 years ago. The new Republican victory strategy, of course. Hmm? Scott Walker won election before he signed the voter ID law. Then he won re-election. He is a great champion of the people but certainly not a fortune teller. There is no way that the great Scott Walker could have known back in May 2011 when he signed the voter ID law the losers and fleabaggers that he thrashed would squeal about voter ID through September 2014. The Madison moochers had 3.5 years to get an ID. Oh don't you worry, Madison will be out in force. I'm more concerned about Milwaukee, where public transportation makes drivers licenses unnecessary and which also will go heavy for Burke surely. Also I don't know who in Madison is mooching. It is a very prosperous, well-educated, and wealthy city. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Miles on October 01, 2014, 02:40:27 PM Also I don't know who in Madison is mooching. It is a very prosperous, well-educated, and wealthy city. Basically, to him, most any Democratic consitituency is to be labeled "freeloaders" or "moochers." 'Very trite, really. Krazen reminds me a lot of David Duke in this regard. People would take him much more seriously if he did without the unnecesarry and hateful epithets. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: DrScholl on October 01, 2014, 04:20:18 PM Quote MULawPoll @MULawPoll · 23s 24 seconds ago A fifth of registered voters are unaware they will need to use photo ID to vote, under recent court ruling. #mulawpoll This is going to cause chaos on election day. That's a hilarious bunch of malarkey given that champion Scott Walker signed legislation requiring such 3 years ago. The new Republican victory strategy, of course. Hmm? Scott Walker won election before he signed the voter ID law. Then he won re-election. He is a great champion of the people but certainly not a fortune teller. There is no way that the great Scott Walker could have known back in May 2011 when he signed the voter ID law the losers and fleabaggers that he thrashed would squeal about voter ID through September 2014. The Madison moochers had 3.5 years to get an ID. I think someone should ask for your ID when you go to vote. As fanatical as you are, you strike me as the type that would vote twice to try to throw Corbett whatever help you could. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: krazen1211 on October 01, 2014, 04:24:03 PM I think someone should ask for your ID when you go to vote. As fanatical as you are, you strike me as the type that would vote twice to try to throw Corbett whatever help you could. I provide my ID when voting freely. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Vega on October 01, 2014, 04:33:35 PM Did Walker piss off Gravis or something?
That being said, I buy this poll. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: krazen1211 on October 01, 2014, 04:34:26 PM Oh don't you worry, Madison will be out in force. I'm more concerned about Milwaukee, where public transportation makes drivers licenses unnecessary and which also will go heavy for Burke surely. Also I don't know who in Madison is mooching. It is a very prosperous, well-educated, and wealthy city. Strangely, the passage of time is more or less identical in Milwaukee, and a more or less identical ~3.5 years has passed since champion Scott Walker signed voter ID into law. In what is a hilarious course of events related to voter ID, the moochers barked in at least 3 state courts, lost, barked in at least 3 federal courts, lost, and are now whining about an electoral timeline and, err, chaos, that they created by not shutting their mouths! If, as you say, champion Scott Walker formulated and implemented a successful 3.5 year strategy for the above, well, I can scarcely think of a more worthy achievement for a potential President of the United States. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Clarko95 📚💰📈 on October 01, 2014, 04:38:39 PM :(
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: DrScholl on October 01, 2014, 04:42:19 PM I think someone should ask for your ID when you go to vote. As fanatical as you are, you strike me as the type that would vote twice to try to throw Corbett whatever help you could. I provide my ID when voting freely. Then you'll have to stock up for the votes you're going to give Corbett. :P I don't buy for one minute you show your ID. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: mypalfish on October 01, 2014, 05:09:54 PM The actual totals were Walker 50.5 and Burke 44.7.
Burke gets nearly 70% in the city of Milwaukee and wins Madison area (Dane County) with about 67%. Walker pretty much cleans up in the rest of the state. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: GaussLaw on October 01, 2014, 05:52:41 PM Awesome news.
I was pretty nervous before this poll, but this looks good. :) Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: KCDem on October 01, 2014, 08:16:54 PM That gender gap is a joke. Obviously this poll is junk.
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Free Bird on October 01, 2014, 08:51:29 PM That gender gap is a joke. Obviously this poll is junk. Marquette is a solid pollster in WI. I'll sound like a broken record, but you only write off this poll because you don't like what it says. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Dixie Reborn on October 01, 2014, 08:54:33 PM That gender gap is a joke. Obviously this poll is junk. Marquette is a solid pollster in WI. I'll sound like a broken record, but you only write off this poll because you don't like what it says. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: TJ in Oregon on October 01, 2014, 09:05:05 PM Quote MULawPoll @MULawPoll · 23s 24 seconds ago A fifth of registered voters are unaware they will need to use photo ID to vote, under recent court ruling. #mulawpoll This is going to cause chaos on election day. Yes it is. I'm amazed that despite this being all over the news and the university sending out multiple campus-wide emails, most of the people I've talked to from out of state still have absolutely no idea they need a photo ID. It's incredible. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Mr. Illini on October 02, 2014, 12:04:25 PM Oh don't you worry, Madison will be out in force. I'm more concerned about Milwaukee, where public transportation makes drivers licenses unnecessary and which also will go heavy for Burke surely. Also I don't know who in Madison is mooching. It is a very prosperous, well-educated, and wealthy city. Strangely, the passage of time is more or less identical in Milwaukee, and a more or less identical ~3.5 years has passed since champion Scott Walker signed voter ID into law. In what is a hilarious course of events related to voter ID, the moochers barked in at least 3 state courts, lost, barked in at least 3 federal courts, lost, and are now whining about an electoral timeline and, err, chaos, that they created by not shutting their mouths! If, as you say, champion Scott Walker formulated and implemented a successful 3.5 year strategy for the above, well, I can scarcely think of a more worthy achievement for a potential President of the United States. It is impossible to take you seriously. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: MasterJedi on October 02, 2014, 12:15:01 PM Can we play the video again where Burke stumbled all over the definition of plagerism and then say that plagerism is exactly what she did with her budget?
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: henster on October 02, 2014, 11:41:49 PM Guess voters don't care about the impending 1.8 billion dollar deficit or the poor jobs numbers. Isn't the economy/jobs supposedly the top issue in the minds of voters?
Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Zanas on October 03, 2014, 07:11:01 AM Can we play the video again where Burke stumbled all over the definition of plagerism and then say that plagerism is exactly what she did with her budget? Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: Badger on October 03, 2014, 10:30:51 AM Oh don't you worry, Madison will be out in force. I'm more concerned about Milwaukee, where public transportation makes drivers licenses unnecessary and which also will go heavy for Burke surely. Also I don't know who in Madison is mooching. It is a very prosperous, well-educated, and wealthy city. Strangely, the passage of time is more or less identical in Milwaukee, and a more or less identical ~3.5 years has passed since champion Scott Walker signed voter ID into law. In what is a hilarious course of events related to voter ID, the moochers barked in at least 3 state courts, lost, barked in at least 3 federal courts, lost, and are now whining about an electoral timeline and, err, chaos, that they created by not shutting their mouths! If, as you say, champion Scott Walker formulated and implemented a successful 3.5 year strategy for the above, well, I can scarcely think of a more worthy achievement for a potential President of the United States. It is impossible to take you seriously. People ask me if I REALLY switched to being a Republican because I seem "reasonable" or the like. If one assumes the "typical" Republican is an unabashed HP like Krazen or Agg. Demand (the former I suspect is 2/3 actual HP and 1/3 trolling), then that's an easy mistake to make. But it's also an unrealistically low threshold by which to judge all blue avatars. Attention whoring aside, Gravis remains junk, Walker is clearly in the lead, but the margin is also clearly too small for anyone to begin popping champaigne corks with a month still to go. Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: mypalfish on October 04, 2014, 11:00:50 AM Gravis Marketing @GravisMarketing · Oct 2
The team Gravis team has decided that we will redo the WI poll due to a skew in Milwaukee respondents. After reviewing the data Reply0 replies Retweet2 retweets2 Favorite0 favorites More Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: IceSpear on October 04, 2014, 11:26:42 AM Gravis Marketing @GravisMarketing · Oct 2 The team Gravis team has decided that we will redo the WI poll due to a skew in Milwaukee respondents. After reviewing the data Reply0 replies Retweet2 retweets2 Favorite0 favorites More lolgravis Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: mypalfish on October 04, 2014, 08:35:19 PM New Gravis results...
Walker 50% Burke 46% Title: Re: WI: Marquette: Walker +5 with LVs Post by: eric82oslo on October 04, 2014, 10:49:07 PM Gravis Marketing @GravisMarketing · Oct 2 The team Gravis team has decided that we will redo the WI poll due to a skew in Milwaukee respondents. After reviewing the data Reply0 replies Retweet2 retweets2 Favorite0 favorites More lolgravis They will gladly toss out their own results whenever it benefits the Republican candidate, but never if the skewing is going against the Democratic candidate. :P |