Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls => Topic started by: RogueBeaver on March 07, 2014, 02:56:25 PM



Title: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: RogueBeaver on March 07, 2014, 02:56:25 PM
Slipping a bit from 40 to 36 with Dillard surging to 23 and Brady at 18.  (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/clout/chi-rauner-dillard-governor-poll-20140307,0,3675788.story)


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: Maxwell on March 07, 2014, 03:51:21 PM
I'm starting to think that Dillard may have a shot. Rauner is definitely more likely, but Dillard's stock is going up considering Rutherfords collapse.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: RogueBeaver on March 07, 2014, 04:07:28 PM
I'm starting to think that Dillard may have a shot. Rauner is definitely more likely, but Dillard's stock is going up considering Rutherfords collapse.

Yeah, though Rauner probably saturates the airwaves to keep Dillard at bay.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on March 09, 2014, 11:47:55 AM
No matter who wins nomination, Quinn positioned himself as the alternative, to these conservative businessmen, who rejects min wage increase.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: Oldiesfreak1854 on March 13, 2014, 05:23:00 PM
No matter who wins nomination, Quinn positioned himself as the alternative, to these conservative businessmen, who rejects min wage increase.
Rauner isn't especially conservative.  He's pro-choice and supports gay marriage, which may help him in the suburbs.  However, I fear his lack of experience and tendency to make gaffes may be too much to overcome against Illinois' infamous Democrat machine.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on March 13, 2014, 05:36:33 PM
Rauner isn't especially conservative.  He's pro-choice and supports gay marriage, which may help him in the suburbs.  However, I fear his lack of experience and tendency to make gaffes may be too much to overcome against Illinois' infamous Democrat machine.
[/quote]

And his gaffe on reducing min wage by 1.00, made him look like an out of touch businessman who doesn't care about poor or elderly with his poor business dealings with nursing homes.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: Mr. Illini on March 16, 2014, 11:57:29 AM
No matter who wins nomination, Quinn positioned himself as the alternative, to these conservative businessmen, who rejects min wage increase.

If this becomes a big issue in the campaign, which it probably will, Quinn's got a beautiful outlook.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on March 16, 2014, 12:12:52 PM
Suburban Cook always come through for Dems because they know how important OHare is. Speed rail and airlines are our future mass transportation. Just like they saved Blago against Topinka, another endangered incumbant.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: Oldiesfreak1854 on March 16, 2014, 01:29:30 PM
Suburban Cook always come through for Dems because they know how important OHare is. Speed rail and airlines are our future mass transportation. Just like they saved Blago against Topinka, another endangered incumbant.
But that was in 2006, which was a good Dem year nationally.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on March 16, 2014, 02:03:30 PM
Suburban Cook always come through for Dems because they know how important OHare is. Speed rail and airlines are our future mass transportation. Just like they saved Blago against Topinka, another endangered incumbant.
But that was in 2006, which was a good Dem year nationally.

who says 2014 won't be? ;)


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: sg0508 on March 16, 2014, 02:10:05 PM
It's simple-minded, but if the GOP couldn't win the statehouse in 2010, I doubt they do it this time around. Yes, the Republicans do win down-ballot races in the state unless some blue states in which they can't sniff a result within 10 points, but 2010 was a disturbing loss.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on March 16, 2014, 03:14:54 PM

But that was in 2006, which was a good Dem year nationally.
[/quote]


That's why Vallas is the LT Gov nominee. Had it not been for Burris winning the urban areas, Vallas would have beaten Blago in 2002 primaries. Blago ran up the score in downstate, while Vallas did well in Sububan Cook.


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: ElectionsGuy on March 16, 2014, 03:26:48 PM
It's simple-minded, but if the GOP couldn't win the statehouse in 2010, I doubt they do it this time around. Yes, the Republicans do win down-ballot races in the state unless some blue states in which they can't sniff a result within 10 points, but 2010 was a disturbing loss.

Rauner is a much better candidate than Brady though, and isn't Quinn even more unpopular now?


Title: Re: IL-Tribune/WGN (R): Rauner up 13
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on March 16, 2014, 03:30:35 PM
Yes, but the state legislature is so gerrymandered with Cook Dems, it is possible Quinn can lose 98/102 counties like he did last time. Quinn doesn't win polls until Election Day. He was trailing Hynes and Brady by 7 pt margins, and expect to do same.