Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion => U.S. Presidential Election Results => Topic started by: CatoMinor on November 14, 2012, 12:38:37 AM



Title: 1848, 1860 & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: CatoMinor on November 14, 2012, 12:38:37 AM
So with 2012 districts. Also I did it by looking at the county results and just guessed so don't expect every single district to be 100% accurate here, but I'd like to think its close.

()


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: Incipimus iterum on November 14, 2012, 12:42:23 AM
impressive good work


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: CatoMinor on November 14, 2012, 12:56:06 AM
That western MN district only had a handful of counties in it that actually voted and the blank district in it is entirely within a county that did no vote.


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on November 14, 2012, 02:12:47 AM
very  cool.

I never realized Lincoln did so well in St Louis.


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: minionofmidas on November 14, 2012, 06:01:46 AM
:D


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: CatoMinor on November 14, 2012, 02:00:13 PM
I love how it was really two separate elections at the same time as opposed to one 4-way election. Lincoln vs Douglas in one part of the country and Breckinridge vs Bell in another.


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자) on November 14, 2012, 08:04:37 PM
very  cool.

I never realized Lincoln did so well in St Louis.

At the time, St. Louis had a bunch of German who didn't own slaves or want them.


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: Gass3268 on November 15, 2012, 06:41:25 PM
I love how it was really two separate elections at the same time as opposed to one 4-way election. Lincoln vs Douglas in one part of the country and Breckinridge vs Bell in another.

Yet at the same time a fatal four way out west. Also shows the many different culture clashes in Missouri.


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: Oldiesfreak1854 on November 15, 2012, 07:15:03 PM
Why are there no district boundaries in South Carolina?


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on November 15, 2012, 07:22:01 PM
Why are there no district boundaries in South Carolina?

No popular voting back then. The State Senate voted on the presidential electors.


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: Kitteh on November 15, 2012, 08:18:05 PM
This map is awesome. Thx :D

What's with that one Breckinridge district in PA?


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: CatoMinor on November 16, 2012, 04:14:31 AM
This map is awesome. Thx :D

What's with that one Breckinridge district in PA?

Breckinrigde did pretty good in parts of PA


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: CatoMinor on November 16, 2012, 08:32:02 PM
Missouri's congressional districts split FOUR ways? Not surprising, but I doubt that's happened before or since. (1824, maybe? Did Debs win any districts in 1912?)
I was gonna say there is a strong chance for Illinois 1824, but I just checked, they only had one district at the time. That was the only state where all 4 where competitive.


Title: Re: 1860 & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: CatoMinor on November 18, 2012, 01:55:29 PM
Because, why not.

()


Title: Re: 1860 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on November 18, 2012, 02:22:23 PM
Cool stuff man. Great job.


Title: Re: 1860 & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: Frodo on December 02, 2012, 04:34:32 PM
It is quite striking just how much support John C. Breckinridge had out west, even in the two officially free states of Oregon and California.

Also, how come neither Breckinridge or Bell win any districts in the southern parts of Illinois and Indiana which were settled by Southern descendants? 


Title: Re: 1860 & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on December 02, 2012, 04:39:39 PM
What I find kind of funny is that in, say, New York, it looks like Republicans had support in the rural areas while Democrats had support in New York City. However in Illinois, Republicans had support in Chicago, but downstate in the more rural areas was McClellan territory.


Title: Re: 1860 & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: Kitteh on December 03, 2012, 11:05:31 AM
What I find kind of funny is that in, say, New York, it looks like Republicans had support in the rural areas while Democrats had support in New York City. However in Illinois, Republicans had support in Chicago, but downstate in the more rural areas was McClellan territory.
I think that has to do with Irish Catholic immigrants in NYC who were strongly Democratic (and anti-war, remember the draft riots) vs WASPs in Upstate NY, compared to German immigrants in Chicago who were strongly Republican vs people descended from Southerners and more culturally close to the South than anywhere else in the North in Downstate Illinois. In other words, the divides were cultural and ethnic, not urban vs rural.


Title: Re: 1860 & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: CatoMinor on December 16, 2012, 01:26:53 PM
It is quite striking just how much support John C. Breckinridge had out west, even in the two officially free states of Oregon and California.

Also, how come neither Breckinridge or Bell win any districts in the southern parts of Illinois and Indiana which were settled by Southern descendants? 

A lot of southern folk moved out west to mine if I'm not mistaken. Also southern Illinois was Douglas's home turf


Title: Re: 1860 & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: Hash on December 16, 2012, 01:30:22 PM
The Democratic machine in IL and IN probably backed Douglas heavily, unlike in PA.


Title: Re: 1860 & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on December 16, 2012, 01:34:07 PM
Yay, Lincoln won my district!

(It has only gone Democratic once in the post-ACW era: 1964).


Title: Re:1848, 1860, & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: CatoMinor on December 16, 2012, 03:11:57 PM
PA was the toughest to do, those gerrymanders are brutal.

()


Title: Re: 1848, 1860 & 1864 by congressional district...kind of...
Post by: CatoMinor on December 16, 2012, 03:22:14 PM
The Taylor district in Iowa had just one county voting in it.