Did you even read his article? They directly address ectopic pregnancies, and the point is those kind of procedures aren't considered abortions.
This amounts to a semantic argument about what constitutes an abortion. If Walker does not consider such procedures to be true abortions, he needed to say so. He could say something like "If something needs to be done to save the mother's life, even if it ends up taking the unborn child's life in the process, it's a tragedy, but it is not in the same category as an abortion." But that's not what Walker said. He said something about other alternatives always being possible, which just sounds like wishful thinking. Hopefully someday there are no life-threatening pregnancies, but we are not there yet.
