Hillary tries to attack bernie on healthcare, fails spectacularly

[Matty]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/272790-sanders-spokesperson-fires-back-at-clinton-for-healthcare

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Pretty much all of her attacks on Bernie have been spectacular fails if you bother to fact check. I think the only one that wasn't a total dud was that he voted against the Brady bill.

[This account no longer in use.]

Let's see how Landslide Lyndon, Lying Steve, and Invisible Obama fight back against this.

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

She's going to sink her own campaign at this rate. Worst case, it will go underwater right after she secures the nomination. And the Republicans will nominate Trump.

Time to send another round of resumes to Canada.

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

She's great, isn't she? I mean, look, I would vote for her because I am a fairly moderate or left wing republican, but I couldn't imagine actual Democrats supporting her.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Let's see how Landslide Lyndon, Lying Steve, and Invisible Obama fight back against this.

Just like the Berniebots fought back  when Sanders accused her for the 1994 crime bill which he voted for.

[Beet]

So because he was standing behind her in a photo he meaningfully contributed to the '93/'94 heath care debate?

[This account no longer in use.]

Let's see how Landslide Lyndon, Lying Steve, and Invisible Obama fight back against this.

Just like the Berniebots fought back  when Sanders accused her for the 1994 crime bill which he voted for.

So you're changing the subject instead of at least giving a plausible reason?

[IceSpear]

Let's see how Landslide Lyndon, Lying Steve, and Invisible Obama fight back against this.

Just like the Berniebots fought back  when Sanders accused her for the 1994 crime bill which he voted for.

So you're changing the subject instead of at least giving a plausible reason?

>Implying Hillary supporters have to agree with every single thing she says or does

[This account no longer in use.]

Let's see how Landslide Lyndon, Lying Steve, and Invisible Obama fight back against this.

Just like the Berniebots fought back  when Sanders accused her for the 1994 crime bill which he voted for.

So you're changing the subject instead of at least giving a plausible reason?

>Implying Hillary supporters have to agree with every single thing she says or does

Not really. It's just that Lyndon tried to change the subject rather than address the issue.

[Lief 🗽]

So because he was standing behind her in a photo he meaningfully contributed to the '93/'94 heath care debate?

Yeah, this might be the stupidest "argument" from the Berniebots yet.

Then again, these are the same deluded imbeciles that think Bernie Sanders opposed the crime bill because he gave a speech against it before voting for it, that think Bernie Sanders supported the auto bailout by voting against it, and think Bernie Sanders "won" Iowa, Massachusetts and Nevada by "virtually tying" Clinton there.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Let's see how Landslide Lyndon, Lying Steve, and Invisible Obama fight back against this.

Just like the Berniebots fought back  when Sanders accused her for the 1994 crime bill which he voted for.

So you're changing the subject instead of at least giving a plausible reason?

>Implying Hillary supporters have to agree with every single thing she says or does

Not really. It's just that Lyndon tried to change the subject rather than address the issue.

I didn't change the subject kid. I just showed you how stupid your question was.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Let's see how Landslide Lyndon, Lying Steve, and Invisible Obama fight back against this.

Just like the Berniebots fought back  when Sanders accused her for the 1994 crime bill which he voted for.

So you're changing the subject instead of at least giving a plausible reason?

>Implying Hillary supporters have to agree with every single thing she says or does

Not really. It's just that Lyndon tried to change the subject rather than address the issue.

I didn't change the subject kid. I just showed you how stupid your question was.

It was a question about the thread title so why post here If you will change the subject?

[CatoMinor]

She's great, isn't she? I mean, look, I would vote for her because I am a fairly moderate or left wing republican, but I couldn't imagine actual Democrats supporting her.

You have seen how the Democrats in your state voted yet, have you?

[This account no longer in use.]

Let's see how Landslide Lyndon, Lying Steve, and Invisible Obama fight back against this.

Just like the Berniebots fought back  when Sanders accused her for the 1994 crime bill which he voted for.

So you're changing the subject instead of at least giving a plausible reason?

>Implying Hillary supporters have to agree with every single thing she says or does

Not really. It's just that Lyndon tried to change the subject rather than address the issue.

I didn't change the subject kid. I just showed you how stupid your question was.

No, you really didn't. For one thing, it was a statement. For another thing, the statement was about the thread title, not the 1994 crime bill.

[Landslide Lyndon]

No, you really didn't.

Whatever kid. Now go to the mall to drink a lemonade with your friends.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

How weak to bring up the 1994 crime bill. If Bernie had voted against it, he would have been sexist for voting against the Violence Against Women Act and would have voted with the NRA against the assault rifle ban.

[This account no longer in use.]

No, you really didn't.

Whatever kid. Now go to the mall to drink a lemonade with your friends.

Ad hominem attack. You have failed to prove your intended point, or any point at all for that matter, and you're too arrogant to admit it.

[Landslide Lyndon]

No, you really didn't.

Whatever kid. Now go to the mall to drink a lemonade with your friends.

Ad hominem attack. You have failed to prove your intended point, or any point at all for that matter, and you're too arrogant to admit it.

What's the ad hominem? You prefer soda?

[This account no longer in use.]

No, you really didn't.

Whatever kid. Now go to the mall to drink a lemonade with your friends.

Ad hominem attack. You have failed to prove your intended point, or any point at all for that matter, and you're too arrogant to admit it.

What's the ad hominem? You prefer soda?

You're focusing on my age, rather than my opinions. You are growing increasingly desperate by rapidly changing topics. It's kind of sad, really.

[Landslide Lyndon]

You're focusing on my age, rather than my opinions. You are growing increasingly desperate by rapidly changing topics. It's kind of sad, really.

With a few tweaks here and there that could very well be a TRUMP tweet.

[This account no longer in use.]

You're focusing on my age, rather than my opinions. You are growing increasingly desperate by rapidly changing topics. It's kind of sad, really.

With a few tweaks here and there that could very well be a TRUMP tweet.

Many posts could be made into Trump tweets with a few tweaks. It just depends on your definition of tweaks, and it's clear that your definition is very different from mine.

[The Other Castro]

Lyndon can you please not attack people with personal insults? It's going to get another thread locked.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Lyndon can you please not attack people with personal insults? It's going to get another thread locked.

I think that's his plan. He knows the OP is rather bad for Hillary, so hopes to get this locked or at least totally derailed.

[Marokai Backbeat]

So because he was standing behind her in a photo he meaningfully contributed to the '93/'94 heath care debate?

It's from a video where she explicitly mentions him in thanking others for the "leadership" on the issue.