Is driving a right or a privilege?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 05:33:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Is driving a right or a privilege?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
right
 
#2
privilege
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Is driving a right or a privilege?  (Read 4700 times)
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: July 02, 2005, 03:49:31 AM »
« edited: July 02, 2005, 04:02:37 AM by Bono »

Oh boy, your systems really are terrible.
The only complain I have about ours is that they should get some of the lines to run twice an hour instead of only once.


And to Everett:
Don't your stops have like a map of the city with the bus routes?
That's how it works in Lisbon.
Logged
Nation
of_thisnation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,555
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: July 03, 2005, 02:38:04 AM »

Damn right it should be a privilege.
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: July 04, 2005, 12:16:49 PM »

Around here, it should be considered a right, because it is often the only realistic method of transportation. There are too many hills to ride a bike, most stores are 15 miles out of town, and the bus system is sh**tty. Thus, it is a natural right - but one that can be revoked from those who abuse it.

The first (or possibly second) post of yours that I can actually agree with Tongue

In rural areas, a *truck* is a necessity. I will need to get one before summer's out.

Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: July 04, 2005, 12:33:40 PM »

Around here, it should be considered a right, because it is often the only realistic method of transportation. There are too many hills to ride a bike, most stores are 15 miles out of town, and the bus system is sh**tty. Thus, it is a natural right - but one that can be revoked from those who abuse it.

The first (or possibly second) post of yours that I can actually agree with Tongue

In rural areas, a *truck* is a necessity. I will need to get one before summer's out.



How about intercounty services? are they any better(if they exist).
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: July 04, 2005, 12:36:21 PM »

There is no such thing as too many hills to ride a bike.

Around here there is.
I've cycled in some pretty bad terrain for that. Takes some getting used to the first week, but no hill is unscalable.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Er...that's a valid concern. Sad
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: July 04, 2005, 12:48:38 PM »

In principle, it is or should be a right: you are entitled to drive as long as you do not harm anyone else while doing so.
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: July 04, 2005, 12:49:47 PM »

Around here, it should be considered a right, because it is often the only realistic method of transportation. There are too many hills to ride a bike, most stores are 15 miles out of town, and the bus system is sh**tty. Thus, it is a natural right - but one that can be revoked from those who abuse it.

The first (or possibly second) post of yours that I can actually agree with Tongue

In rural areas, a *truck* is a necessity. I will need to get one before summer's out.



How about intercounty services? are they any better(if they exist).

There is one: Greyhound, but that is a national bus service, and not really local to any US county. Features:

(+) Ridership is a diverse cross section of America's illegal immigrant and paroled felon population

(-) Expensive (a 90 mile trip from Baton Rouge to New Orleans, a heavily traveled route, is $20+); unbearably slow; inconvenient (bus terminals are invariably located in the *slums* of the city); dirty and slightly nauseating, etc.

There is no alternative to an automobile in the US, outside of the coastal conurbations.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: July 04, 2005, 01:15:50 PM »

Around here, it should be considered a right, because it is often the only realistic method of transportation. There are too many hills to ride a bike, most stores are 15 miles out of town, and the bus system is sh**tty. Thus, it is a natural right - but one that can be revoked from those who abuse it.

The first (or possibly second) post of yours that I can actually agree with Tongue

In rural areas, a *truck* is a necessity. I will need to get one before summer's out.



How about intercounty services? are they any better(if they exist).

There is one: Greyhound, but that is a national bus service, and not really local to any US county. Features:

(+) Ridership is a diverse cross section of America's illegal immigrant and paroled felon population

(-) Expensive (a 90 mile trip from Baton Rouge to New Orleans, a heavily traveled route, is $20+); unbearably slow; inconvenient (bus terminals are invariably located in the *slums* of the city); dirty and slightly nauseating, etc.

There is no alternative to an automobile in the US, outside of the coastal conurbations.

Except hitching a ride. Smiley
That must suck for backpackers.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.