McAuliffe say Clinton is willing to walk back on TPP. Then reverses his comments (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 03:48:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  McAuliffe say Clinton is willing to walk back on TPP. Then reverses his comments (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: McAuliffe say Clinton is willing to walk back on TPP. Then reverses his comments  (Read 882 times)
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,050
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« on: July 26, 2016, 11:10:00 PM »

I believe she will do the right thing.  Preferably though, the lame duck congress will push it through after the election and we won't have to worry about it.

Congress would need balls of steel to do that when something like 95-98% of the country will be voting for a candidate who opposes it. I'm skeptical that it would work even in a lame duck.

Trumps anti-free trade message will be discredited once he loses.  Most of the Republican congressmen who would vote against it due to fear of Trump reprisal won't have to worry anymore.
Are you sure about that

Yes.  The Republican delegation overwhelmingly supports it.  If there were a Republican POTUS instead of Obama, it'd likely be even more unanimous.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,050
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2016, 10:04:32 AM »

The Hillary campaign threw McAuliffe under the bus on this one. Hillary has assumed the mantle of the "protectionist lite" candidate in this election, and given her opponent, is not going to be walking that back, at least prior to election day.

I know it's semi-important for you to now believe that the Democrats can morph into a fiscally moderate party where you can feel politically at home (especially after defecting from the GOP), but keep dreamin'.  There's nothing "lite" about her protectionism, and any Democrat who wants to get the nomination in the near future is going to have to hold similar views, IMO.  This primary season made that obvious.  I'd argue there's a much higher chance of the next Republican nominee being for free trade than the next Democratic one.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,050
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2016, 12:01:57 PM »

I believe she will do the right thing.  Preferably though, the lame duck congress will push it through after the election and we won't have to worry about it.

Congress would need balls of steel to do that when something like 95-98% of the country will be voting for a candidate who opposes it. I'm skeptical that it would work even in a lame duck.

Trumps anti-free trade message will be discredited once he loses.  Most of the Republican congressmen who would vote against it due to fear of Trump reprisal won't have to worry anymore.

Another reason to make sure that Hillary Clinton is elected.

There can be no good Republican who does not vote Clinton this time.

What about Clinton's anti-free trade message, buddy?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.