Canada 2011 Official Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 07:24:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Canada 2011 Official Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 48
Author Topic: Canada 2011 Official Thread  (Read 136058 times)
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #375 on: April 21, 2011, 03:56:52 AM »

I'm speachless.

31% in Quebec would get the NDP 36 seats.

Download my ElectoMatic and test this out yourself.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,632
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #376 on: April 21, 2011, 04:04:01 AM »


Well, imagine the head of Duceppe went he will hear that poll.

He will be speechless, I think. Well, it is his fault, he was too negative, I think.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #377 on: April 21, 2011, 04:51:15 AM »

NDP as official opposition plus a Tory majority would give the nation plenty of time (like, four years) to get used to the NDP as an alternative government.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,632
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #378 on: April 21, 2011, 06:37:56 AM »

Nanos. Again a big swing from the Liberals to the NDP, for the second day in row

Conservative    39.0%    -0.1    
Liberal    26.7%    -1.7    
NDP    22.1%    +2.3    
BQ    7.5%    -0.2    
Green    3.4%    -0.5    

For the record, they have the NDP at 23% in Quebec, down from 2 from yesterday.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,410
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #379 on: April 21, 2011, 07:07:17 AM »

If the NDP allows for some reason a Tory majority I'll be pissed. And if the NDP allows my retard MP to be reelected they can all go DIAF.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #380 on: April 21, 2011, 07:09:22 AM »

I am voting tomorrow at noon.

I'm actually debating voting NDP.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,632
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #381 on: April 21, 2011, 07:13:27 AM »

If the NDP allows for some reason a Tory majority I'll be pissed. And if the NDP allows my retard MP to be reelected they can all go DIAF.

It is not the NDP fault if Liberals are selecting inept leaders...
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #382 on: April 21, 2011, 07:21:13 AM »

If the NDP allows for some reason a Tory majority I'll be pissed. And if the NDP allows my retard MP to be reelected they can all go DIAF.

Oh come on. If through any circumstance there ends up being a Conservative majority there is only one party to blame and it's the Liberals for being weak, directionless, inept, and utterly uninspiring.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #383 on: April 21, 2011, 07:24:23 AM »

If the NDP allows for some reason a Tory majority I'll be pissed. And if the NDP allows my retard MP to be reelected they can all go DIAF.

Oh please. Orleans is a safe Tory seat these days.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #384 on: April 21, 2011, 07:27:05 AM »

Also I finally got around to watching the english debate. I found it fairly interesting. Harper seems calm to an almost sociopath level, and Ignatieff seemed pretty good but only in a few moments, and incredibly arrogant in others. I don't understand why he thinks the sense of entitlement he assumes the Liberals have on government would make anyone more likely to vote for the Liberal Party. Layton seemed pretty good, but I'm biased of course.

Duceppe just sounded like a lunatic to me half the time, but that may just be because I'm not used to hearing separatists.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,410
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #385 on: April 21, 2011, 07:35:50 AM »

If the NDP allows for some reason a Tory majority I'll be pissed. And if the NDP allows my retard MP to be reelected they can all go DIAF.

Oh please. Orleans is a safe Tory seat these days.

We actually have a good candidate who actually cares about winning the seat, especially against a useless old yes-man geezer. Most people admit that if there's one race in Ottawa which is actually worth watching, it remains Orleans.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,764
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #386 on: April 21, 2011, 07:44:27 AM »
« Edited: April 21, 2011, 07:46:18 AM by Holmes »

If the Conservatives make gains in the Toronto suburbs and are mostly unaffected by the NDP surge in Quebec... that would suck.

Can the NDP gain seats in Nova Scotia? They had a great year there in 2009.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,807
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #387 on: April 21, 2011, 07:44:41 AM »

Bizarre, yet rather pleasing.

Regarding comparisons with the LibDem surge over here last year, one important difference is that the sudden spike in LibDem poll ratings happened (more or less) over a single weekend after the first televised debate, and not incrementally. It's fairly clear in retrospect that it was mostly the consequence of the collective incompetence of the polling industry; they were (and still are) basing their work off essentially useless statistics (including - ah, a pet hate - a model of occupation groups from the 1970s that wasn't even much use during the 1970s and which has no relationship to the reality of work in Britain in 2010) and dangerously crude assumptions about electoral motivation, turnout and so on.

Of course that doesn't make this 'real'. It's just that the chances of it being unreal are lower than the obvious cautionary tale.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,410
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #388 on: April 21, 2011, 07:51:22 AM »

If the Conservatives make gains in the Toronto suburbs and are mostly unaffected by the NDP surge in Quebec... that would suck.


Exactly. If the NDP's vote increases everywhere, even where they're weak they'll only serve to split the non-Purgatory vote and allow them to be reelected or gain seats. And, that, my friends, wouldn't be good. If the NDP can gain seats off the Purgs, then all the power to them but if they use to split the vote and elect more Purgs they can go DIAF.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,632
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #389 on: April 21, 2011, 07:57:40 AM »

If the Conservatives make gains in the Toronto suburbs and are mostly unaffected by the NDP surge in Quebec... that would suck.


Exactly. If the NDP's vote increases everywhere, even where they're weak they'll only serve to split the non-Purgatory vote and allow them to be reelected or gain seats. And, that, my friends, wouldn't be good. If the NDP can gain seats off the Purgs, then all the power to them but if they use to split the vote and elect more Purgs they can go DIAF.

Well, I don't see NDP saying to its voters "Vote Liberal to not split the anti-Tory vote". Neither I see the Liberals doing that, either.

Our electoral system is bad, don't blame NDP for it (they were never in power), blame Liberals and Conservatives.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,764
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #390 on: April 21, 2011, 07:59:59 AM »

It's not a terrible electoral system, it's the mindset of Canadians that it's either Liberals or Conservatives, and that's it. If the NDP makes big gains in this election at the cost of a Conservative majority, but they start to become a more viable option, then that's a net plus imo. I mean, Harper already does what he wants already anyway, even in the minority.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,807
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #391 on: April 21, 2011, 08:06:57 AM »

Saying that, weren't ADQ leading for parts of that election in Quebec?
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #392 on: April 21, 2011, 08:17:00 AM »

Saying that, weren't ADQ leading for parts of that election in Quebec?
No.
The ADQ outperformed the polls by a good margin.
The polls had the ADQ sitting on 25 seats, and that was the "huge story"
They ended up with 41.
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #393 on: April 21, 2011, 08:19:43 AM »
« Edited: April 21, 2011, 08:23:18 AM by Leftbehind »

It's not a terrible electoral system, it's the mindset of Canadians that it's either Liberals or Conservatives, and that's it.

But FPTP leads to that mindset? I remember seeing a poll before last year's UK election showing a majority of the population would vote Lib Dem but they felt it was a waste of time.

This video neatly shows how FPTP encourages two party systems.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,807
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #394 on: April 21, 2011, 08:22:09 AM »

Saying that, weren't ADQ leading for parts of that election in Quebec?
No.
The ADQ outperformed the polls by a good margin.
The polls had the ADQ sitting on 25 seats, and that was the "huge story"
They ended up with 41.

Ah, perhaps I'm confusing 'my fears' with 'the polls'. But examples of past poll surges in Canada, anyone?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,807
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #395 on: April 21, 2011, 08:23:02 AM »

But FPTP leads to that mindset? I remember seeing a poll before last year's UK election showing a majority of the population would vote Lib Dem but they felt it was a waste of time.

That was a laughably loaded question though. Not the first time they tried it either.
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #396 on: April 21, 2011, 08:25:01 AM »

Meh, I can't remember it now, but it didn't seem that unbelievable at the height of Cleggmania. Point stands though, FPTP's spoiler effect helps discourage people from voting who they'd prefer.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #397 on: April 21, 2011, 08:34:49 AM »

Saying that, weren't ADQ leading for parts of that election in Quebec?
No.
The ADQ outperformed the polls by a good margin.
The polls had the ADQ sitting on 25 seats, and that was the "huge story"
They ended up with 41.

Ah, perhaps I'm confusing 'my fears' with 'the polls'. But examples of past poll surges in Canada, anyone?

1988. Federal.
Pre Debate, the PC party had like 45% and the Liberals like 25%
Post Debate the Liberals had 45%
It was what knocked the NDP out of contention (I have an interesting what if on this btw)

2006. Federal.
The Tories went from about 10% to 20% in Quebec polls, and from 0 to 10 seats in the province on election day.

That's all I can think of off hand.
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #398 on: April 21, 2011, 08:35:35 AM »

If the Conservatives make gains in the Toronto suburbs and are mostly unaffected by the NDP surge in Quebec... that would suck.


Exactly. If the NDP's vote increases everywhere, even where they're weak they'll only serve to split the non-Purgatory vote and allow them to be reelected or gain seats. And, that, my friends, wouldn't be good. If the NDP can gain seats off the Purgs, then all the power to them but if they use to split the vote and elect more Purgs they can go DIAF.

Let's have French majority system in Canada and 40% would be just that. And you could be pleased with a coalition Liberals-NDP.
Let's extradite Marleix to Ottawa Grin.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #399 on: April 21, 2011, 08:36:24 AM »

Also a note.

In 2006 the CPC (Tories) jumped threefold (In Quebec). They took about three times as many votes in 2006 as they did in 2004. My mathematical projection method successfully projected that this meant they would win 10 seats. Other projection websites are nervous because the NDP now has seen a threefold jump in Quebec...

My projection program is free for download Wink
http://www.ridingbyriding.ca/
On the right hand side. ElectoMatic.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 48  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 9 queries.