The Delegate Fight: Obama Clinches! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 04:11:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  The Delegate Fight: Obama Clinches! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Delegate Fight: Obama Clinches!  (Read 49219 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: March 05, 2008, 08:44:24 PM »

What do you need from the Seattle area, Erc?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2008, 12:51:52 AM »

I think I'll have that for you when you get back.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2008, 11:58:00 PM »

Didn't the Obama camp confirm that rumor?  Whatever happened to them?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2008, 12:15:52 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

3/5, last Wednesday.  What happened?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2008, 02:25:27 PM »

I disagree with the use of the Washington primary to claim that the various biases of counting the primary votes of caucuses cancel themselves out. You have a perfectly fine model with Texas where both the primary and the caucuses counted. Use that.

Some people get to double-vote?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2008, 03:50:18 PM »
« Edited: April 09, 2008, 05:27:42 PM by Alcon »

I disagree with the use of the Washington primary to claim that the various biases of counting the primary votes of caucuses cancel themselves out. You have a perfectly fine model with Texas where both the primary and the caucuses counted. Use that.

Some people get to double-vote?

What's with the obtuse response? I'm saying that Texas is irreplaceable when it comes to any analysis of the difference in results between primary and caucuses.

I didn't mean to be obtuse.  I was asking an honest question.

I'm objecting to the idea that it's "perfectly fine" because it artificially inflates the vote total in given states.  That's not to say any system is perfectly fine, but there is nothing "perfect" about that.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2008, 04:40:38 PM »

I'm not advocating double counting anything.

Counting both the primary and caucus would essentially be doing that, especially in Texas, no?

Or, more specifically, giving one voter twice the representation as in another state.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2008, 05:28:06 PM »

I'm not advocating counting both the Texas primary and the caucuses. I'm responding to Erc's analysis on how to put primary and caucuses on an equal footing for the purpose of determining who would be the "legitimate" winner of the Democratic nomination.

Oh, yikes.

Zoom, right over my head.

Sorry.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #8 on: April 15, 2008, 02:30:17 PM »

I left a message with them earlier today to find out.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2008, 12:05:18 PM »

AP is reporting that provisional ballots have given Obama two "uncalled" pledged delegates in Ohio.  I'm not sure whether you have that in your numbers, Erc.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2008, 09:21:48 PM »

Erc, you are the man.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.