I generally dislike Cleveland. He was rather anti-labor and against almost all federal aid, even though many areas drastically needed it during his time. Though he was probably better than Harrison, who was basically a giant lump who took up space in the White House.
When the labor strikers in Chicgao durring the Pullman strike stooped the U.S. mail than Cleveland had the right and the responcibilty to use force against them.
First, I agree that Cleveland was an exceptionally good president. Second, didn't Truman effectively do the same thing with the railroads, nationalizing them?