U.S. presidential election, 1928 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 07:53:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  U.S. presidential election, 1928 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for?
#1
Hoover (R)
 
#2
Smith (D)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: U.S. presidential election, 1928  (Read 2273 times)
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,781


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« on: January 03, 2006, 06:03:10 PM »

Smith, out of distaste for Republican corruption, distaste for the anti-Catholicism and dismay at the death of Progressive republicanism.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,781


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2006, 06:43:17 AM »

Smith, out of distaste for Republican corruption, distaste for the anti-Catholicism and dismay at the death of Progressive republicanism.

What Republican corruption? You talking about the deceased halfwit, Harding?

Hoover was a "progressive," by all means.

Mostly the Tea Pot Dome, or whatever it was called, yes. But considering how the GOP won the 1924 election despite it I would have wanted them punished, I think. And I don't believe Hoover was a progressive (you might view him as too leftist, yes, but the Progressive Republicans were pretty much over by 1928). I would probably have voted for Bob LaFolette in 1924 and been a Roosevelt supporter back in his days, so I would have been displeased with the rooting out of Progressive Republicans.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,781


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2006, 06:46:35 AM »

Hoover actually had a lot of accomplished. They were just all bad.

Black Tuesday, of course, was not the "cause" of the Great Depression.

What do you mean by that? I thought the disappearance of the somewha artificial wealth based on over-priced stocks was what triggered fall in investments, consumption, etc and then harmed over-producing farmers and the like, as demand collapsed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.