The notion that Kamala Harris is a weak candidate

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Harris was literally responsible for turning what was supposed to be a landslide for her party into a close race last year, by turbocharging racist voter turnout. She is clearly weak.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Harris was literally responsible for turning what was supposed to be a landslide for her party into a close race last year, by turbocharging racist voter turnout. She is clearly weak.

That's ridiculous. It was a close race because polling was off and Trump has a unique appeal to low-turnout voters, Harris had nothing to do with it. Nobody voted for Trump because of Harris.

"Trump has a unique appeal to low-turnout voters"

Romney votes, 2012 - 61 million.
Trump votes 2016 - 63 million.
Trump votes 2020 - 74 million.

Nope

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Harris was literally responsible for turning what was supposed to be a landslide for her party into a close race last year, by turbocharging racist voter turnout. She is clearly weak.

That's ridiculous. It was a close race because polling was off and Trump has a unique appeal to low-turnout voters, Harris had nothing to do with it. Nobody voted for Trump because of Harris.

"Trump has a unique appeal to low-turnout voters"

Romney votes, 2012 - 61 million.
Trump votes 2016 - 63 million.
Trump votes 2020 - 74 million.

Nope

I don't see how this disproves my point. Trump got a lot more votes than he did in 2016, yet performed worse percentage wise. Ergo, Trump turned out many people who didn't vote in 2012 or 2016, also known as voters with low turnout. Kamala Harris being the VP nominee didn't cause those people to turn out, Trump did.

If it was a Trump effect, then he would have received way more votes in 2016 than he actually did.