Superdelegates are an affront to democracy and should not exist (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 02:52:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Superdelegates are an affront to democracy and should not exist (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Agree or disagree?
#1
Agree
 
#2
Disagree
 
#3
Other/Neutral
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 75

Author Topic: Superdelegates are an affront to democracy and should not exist  (Read 2911 times)
Kalimantan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 841
Indonesia


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -1.74

« on: February 10, 2016, 08:29:56 AM »

Theoretically, how would people react if Sanders won the popular primary vote, but the superdelegates made Clinton the nominee?

Won't happen, superdelegates are almost a ceremonial thing, they'll swing whichever way the wind blows. Take 2008. If all the superdelegates voted the way they originally pledged, Hillary would have been the nominee. But huge numbers switched to Obama because he won the popular vote. That'll happen over and again
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 11 queries.