Does Wikileaks have anything more on DNC/HRC/etc megethread

[Dr. Arch]

They finally fell off the deep end along with Trump in the last debate.

[Dr. Arch]

You're not a true terrorist group until you take credit for things you're not responsible for. Good work, wikileaks.

[Dr. Arch]

Wikileaks has NOTHING and yet they attack the US? They're enemies of this nation and this will just make more Americans want to vote for Clinton more.

Supporters, not necessarily Wikileaks themselves.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I can agree with them on this ^^^

They should stop colluding with Russia to interfere with our election then. If they want to be the freedom fighters they purported to be, they should have used individual sources, not the Russian government, effectively acting as a wing of their cyber-terror efforts.

"The action came after U.S. officials conveyed their conclusion that Assange is a willing participant in a Russian intelligence operation to undermine the U.S. presidential election, NBC News has learned. U.S. intelligence officials believe Assange knows he is getting the information from Russian intelligence, though they do not believe he is involved in helping plan the hacking, officials told NBC. "

[Dr. Arch]

Wikileaks has NOTHING and yet they attack the US? They're enemies of this nation and this will just make more Americans want to vote for Clinton more.

Supporters, not necessarily Wikileaks themselves.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I can agree with them on this ^^^

They should stop colluding with Russia to interfere with our election then. If they want to be the freedom fighters they purported to be, they should have used individual sources, not the Russian government, effectively acting as a wing of their cyber-terror efforts.

"The action came after U.S. officials conveyed their conclusion that Assange is a willing participant in a Russian intelligence operation to undermine the U.S. presidential election, NBC News has learned. U.S. intelligence officials believe Assange knows he is getting the information from Russian intelligence, though they do not believe he is involved in helping plan the hacking, officials told NBC. "

Trump says everything is rigged.  Clinton blames everything on the Russians.

I literally said nothing about HRC or Trump in that response.

[Dr. Arch]

Wikileaks has NOTHING and yet they attack the US? They're enemies of this nation and this will just make more Americans want to vote for Clinton more.

Supporters, not necessarily Wikileaks themselves.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I can agree with them on this ^^^

They should stop colluding with Russia to interfere with our election then. If they want to be the freedom fighters they purported to be, they should have used individual sources, not the Russian government, effectively acting as a wing of their cyber-terror efforts.

"The action came after U.S. officials conveyed their conclusion that Assange is a willing participant in a Russian intelligence operation to undermine the U.S. presidential election, NBC News has learned. U.S. intelligence officials believe Assange knows he is getting the information from Russian intelligence, though they do not believe he is involved in helping plan the hacking, officials told NBC. "

Why is it OK to get money from dictators and use them in philanthropic purpose (Clinton Foundation), but it is not OK to get information from Russians and use them to expose corrupt politicians (Wikileaks)?

It's okay because the money is used for the general good of people in the world, regardless of where it comes from so long as it's obtained by legal means.

It's not okay to function as a wing of a foreign government that is aggressive towards the target, releasing information obtained through cyber-attacks that may or may not be accurate. It's even more-so not okay when you do it under the guise that you're some sort of freedom fighting organization, when you're clearly acting partisan.

They would've attempted to obtain Trump's tax records, for instance, if they really wanted to, but that's not their goal. They've been reduced to a Russian propaganda machine attempting to undermine the US election so that Russia may obtain a better standing in the world by weakening the US.

[Dr. Arch]

Because the latter is illegal. Next. Besides, if an asshole wants to make the world a better place, who are we to stop them? The entire alt-right meme about inner city rioters try to get what they want moot.

It's okay because the money is used for the general good of people in the world, regardless of where it comes from so long as it's obtained by legal means.

Guys, you know who dictators are and what they do? SA, Qatar etc... It kind of ok to rape women overthere...

It's not okay to function as a wing of a foreign government that is aggressive towards the target, releasing information obtained through cyber-attacks that may or may not be accurate. It's even more-so not okay when you do it under the guise that you're some sort of freedom fighting organization, when you're clearly acting partisan.

WL have so far never faked their data. If this they did it, they would easily exposed. I repeat EASILY.
Aggressive? 95% of their action is just actually publishing the data and hosting.
5% trolling in Twitter. Wouldn't call it aggressive. And yeah, they have always been that way (more or less) even when they published data about USA:s actions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those days they were heroes, at least in Europe

They would've attempted to obtain Trump's tax records, for instance, if they really wanted to, but that's not their goal. They've been reduced to a Russian propaganda machine attempting to undermine the US election so that Russia may obtain a better standing in the world by weakening the US.

Um, no. They are not hackers. They get data, publish it and hold hackers back. That is the reason why hackers give them data and not for example media. Obama would press media and hackers would be droned, but Assange has balls. He and Snowden live a [relatively] miserable lives, but not giving up

Les misarables

Not to mention they editorialize the information they put out instead of letting people understand the information. Their organization is clearly slanted against the US. Why trust them when they're publishing and editorializing information that we KNOW was stolen by Russian cyber-attacks? No.

[Dr. Arch]

Not to mention they editorialize the information they put out instead of letting people understand the information. Their organization is clearly slanted against the US. Why trust them when they're publishing and editorializing information that we KNOW was stolen by Russian cyber-attacks? No.

As I said they are media for hackers. Why do media sometimes say that they will tomorrow release intresting polls in battleground states instead of letting people understand the information? The same to WL.

But in the end they just released this information, and you can search it, mail by mail. So what's wrong. They have so far released more than 10mln emails about everything (Syrian, Guantanamo, US in Iraq, US in Afghanistan etc) https://wikileaks.org/-Leaks-.html

No, they are against corrupt (as they think) system in USA.

We don't know. But OK. It was Russians, so what? Does information becomes less worth?


This conversation goes nowhere, so my last attempt is an extreme example:
Let's imagine, Mexican hackers hacked Trump and handed it to WL. Would it be OK publish it?
No? Even if they founded evidence that proved Trump is Putin's puppet? But the publication would interfer the election, right?

No, it wouldn't be okay. It's still downright criminal and the work of foreign espionage and propaganda.

[Dr. Arch]

L- O -L

[Dr. Arch]

Such an evil person, amIrite?

[Dr. Arch]

Such an evil person, amIrite?

PR-trick. The girl is "famous", so they would get a story in CNN.

Why otherwise choose this particalur girl? There is for god sake 70mln refugee. Just google something about hunger in africa, for f**k sake. But this way, you don't get into CNN. amIrite?

Ever heard of the Clinton Foundation? SMH