OK Sen. Special Election 2014 R Primary
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 06:24:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  OK Sen. Special Election 2014 R Primary		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
James Lankford		  
#2
T.W Shannon		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 25

Author Topic: OK Sen. Special Election 2014 R Primary  (Read 395 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 27, 2014, 08:06:34 PM »
Lankford.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2014, 08:07:58 PM »
Shannon easily.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2014, 08:10:31 PM »
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2014, 08:14:02 PM »
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,342
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2014, 08:15:14 PM »
I prefer Shannon
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2014, 08:43:41 PM »
Shannon just seems more interesting overall.
Logged
Nutmeg
thepolitic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,925
United States Minor Outlying Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2014, 08:47:51 PM »
Lankford. Because even though he's likely also a bigot, at least he doesn't mention his bigotry upfront on his website, unlike Shannon.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,497
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2014, 10:53:55 PM »
Which one would lose?
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2014, 10:57:39 PM »

It's Oklahoma, so probably neither.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2014, 11:21:09 PM »

Democrats are going to nominate Constance Johnson, who is actually liberal on social issues, which means not even Brogdon can lose this one.
Logged
Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,385
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 27, 2014, 11:22:14 PM »
I don't know much about either of these guys other than that Lankford is apparently a seminary graduate and counseled a youth Bible camp before he came to Congress and has awful foreign/national security policy views.  Shannon is the first black OK House Speaker.  I'm obviously not voting on electability here since it is, after all, Oklahoma, but Shannon seems to be the more reasonable of the two.
Logged
Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,385
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 27, 2014, 11:23:44 PM »
Quote from: IDS Legislator Maxwell on April 27, 2014, 11:21:09 PM

Democrats are going to nominate Constance Johnson, who is actually liberal on social issues, which means not even Brogdon can lose this one.

Who are you supporting, Maxwell?
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 27, 2014, 11:27:49 PM »
Quote from: Emperor Scott on April 27, 2014, 11:23:44 PM
Quote from: IDS Legislator Maxwell on April 27, 2014, 11:21:09 PM

Democrats are going to nominate Constance Johnson, who is actually liberal on social issues, which means not even Brogdon can lose this one.

Who are you supporting, Maxwell?

I could support Johnson against Lankford and maybe even against Shannon.  Oklahoma could use a shake-up. That's not for certain though.

I am certainly supporting Dorman over Fallin.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,711
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2014, 12:17:44 AM »
I'd vote for Jason Weger.   But of these two awful replacements for Coburn I guess Shannon has the advantage of not being Lankford.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2014, 12:32:53 AM »
I'm surprised at how well Shannon is doing.

I'd rather a leadership type with a socon streak over another member of the Cruz/Lee/Paul caucus.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 28, 2014, 06:53:00 AM »
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.238 seconds with 14 queries.