Abraham Lincoln vs. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 08:17:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Abraham Lincoln vs. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Who was better?
#1
Lincoln (D)
 
#2
Lincoln (R)
 
#3
Lincoln (I/O)
 
#4
FDR (D)
 
#5
FDR (R)
 
#6
FDR (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 79

Author Topic: Abraham Lincoln vs. Franklin Delano Roosevelt  (Read 2446 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,823


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 09, 2015, 12:29:31 AM »

FDR. Lincoln is only the 2nd best President.
Logged
Orthogonian Society Treasurer
CommanderClash
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,561
Bermuda


Political Matrix
E: 0.32, S: 4.78

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 09, 2015, 12:49:41 AM »

The one that didn't create the managerial state.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 09, 2015, 03:48:50 PM »

Both two of the worst presidents in American history. Since Lincoln would rather me be a slave, FDR

Yeah, Lincoln just loved people being slaves, unlike the good people of Texas...
The man didn't care about abolishing slavery until it was politically feasible. He would have kept the union together if it meant slavery existed. Lincoln was trash and a racist

Have you actually read any of Lincoln's speeches/ writings from his pre-presidential career? It's pretty clear that the man abhorred slavery and wanted to see it eliminated. And yes, it's impossible to do something through the political process unless it's "politically feasible", so I'm not sure why that's part of your argument. The moment it was feasible to abolish slavery, Lincoln jumped at the chance, even when some so-called "anti-slavery" men (Horace Greeley, Salmon Chase, etc.) urged him to drop the issue. Calling Lincoln "racist" because he didn't end slavery until it was possible is ridiculous, especially considering that you're defending the people who actually had the power to end slavery in the process.

Yes, at the very worst it is comparable to Barack Obama changing his position on gay marriage even though every one knew he was always on favor of it anyway.

And that would still be a very wrong comparison anyways, given that Lincoln was NEVER pro-slavery at any point in his political career. Racist?  Very likely.  But pro-slavery?  No way Jose, please read up on what being pro-slavery actually means please.
Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 09, 2015, 04:28:28 PM »

Voted Lincoln.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 09, 2015, 08:00:23 PM »

Lincoln (sane), though they would both be in my top five presidents.
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 09, 2015, 08:03:29 PM »
« Edited: June 09, 2015, 11:41:13 PM by Cryptic »

Yes, let's get back to our FDR roots. We can start by putting everyone from the Middle East into camps.

Why do that when we can suspend habeus corpus and impose martial law? Cause that clearly defined all of Lincoln's Presidency just as much as internment defined FDRs! Roll Eyes  Pretending only one of them did questionable things is very disingenuous and doesn't diminish how important either one was to our country's history.

I voted for Lincoln, but both of them are easily the two greatest Presidents. Lincoln ended slavery. FDR guaranteed Allied victory in WWII. This was a very tough choice. Honestly, my vote would probably change from day to day.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 10, 2015, 09:27:36 AM »

Yes, let's get back to our FDR roots. We can start by putting everyone from the Middle East into camps.

Why do that when we can suspend habeus corpus and impose martial law? Cause that clearly defined all of Lincoln's Presidency just as much as internment defined FDRs! Roll Eyes  Pretending only one of them did questionable things is very disingenuous and doesn't diminish how important either one was to our country's history.

I voted for Lincoln, but both of them are easily the two greatest Presidents. Lincoln ended slavery. FDR guaranteed Allied victory in WWII. This was a very tough choice. Honestly, my vote would probably change from day to day.


Yes, temporary suspension of due process while a war is happening on the nations soil is totally on the same level as imprisoning an entire ethnic group out of war paranoia from a conflict taking place largely thousands of miles away from most Americans.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 11, 2015, 02:46:53 PM »

The one that didn't create the managerial state.

It's kind of cute to pretend that the bureaucratic evolution of capitalism in the 20th Century was the result of one person, rather than an array of social forces that more or less forced the development of a state apparatus to more effectively regulate social conflict and promote industrial development.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 12 queries.