Wallace doesn't do a third party run in 1968 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 12:15:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Wallace doesn't do a third party run in 1968 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Wallace doesn't do a third party run in 1968  (Read 3467 times)
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35
« on: March 13, 2006, 11:09:14 PM »
Quote from: Governor Cosmo Kramer on March 13, 2006, 06:06:43 PM
Much closer to the opposite, actually.  Many of Wallace's supporters in the North were conservative suburbanites who would have gone for Nixon.

Preston's correct here. IIRC Busing was the big issue in some northern areas that Wallace capitalized on.



Nixon - 283
HHH   - 255

Nixon picks up votes from Wallace to win PA, MD, and MI. HHH takes the South.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.