Reelected Senators in the 2012 US Senate election: Jon Tester is the Survivor (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 10:35:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  Survivor
  Reelected Senators in the 2012 US Senate election: Jon Tester is the Survivor (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Reelected Senators in the 2012 US Senate election: Jon Tester is the Survivor  (Read 7635 times)
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« on: December 28, 2012, 08:03:20 AM »

Eliminate Klobuchar

Immunize Tester
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2012, 03:58:30 PM »

3 Klobuchar
2 Gillibrand
1 Casey
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2012, 04:33:38 PM »

3 Klobuchar
7 Gillibrand
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2013, 01:49:51 PM »

Eliminate Gillibrand (5)

Save Tester (5)
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2013, 03:22:53 PM »

Eliminate Brown (5)

Save Tester (5)
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2013, 12:57:45 PM »

Did we really just eliminate one of our best worst Senators?

Fixed that for you.

3 Feinstein
2 Nelson
1 Stabenow
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2013, 04:37:49 PM »

Did we really just eliminate one of our best worst Senators?

Fixed that for you.

Are you a Wall Street Shill?

No, just a shill for a free and open Internet, a lack of indefinite detention of US citizens, and no war with Iran.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2013, 04:54:32 PM »

Did we really just eliminate one of our best worst Senators?

Fixed that for you.

Are you a Wall Street Shill?

No, just a shill for a free and open Internet, a lack of indefinite detention of US citizens, and no war with Iran.

I would agree that his co-sponsorship of the Protect-IP Act was disappointing, but other than that his record has been stellar and I doubt that someone that was consistently against the war in Iraq would support a war in Iran. 

Then why did he vote for HR 1540 and S. Res. 380? He may have been anti-Iraq, but being consistently against the war in Iraq doesn't mean you're anti-war, not by any measurement (the current President can attest to that by his own actions).
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2013, 08:11:50 PM »

Did we really just eliminate one of our best worst Senators?

Fixed that for you.

Are you a Wall Street Shill?

No, just a shill for a free and open Internet, a lack of indefinite detention of US citizens, and no war with Iran.

I would agree that his co-sponsorship of the Protect-IP Act was disappointing, but other than that his record has been stellar and I doubt that someone that was consistently against the war in Iraq would support a war in Iran. 

Then why did he vote for HR 1540 and S. Res. 380? He may have been anti-Iraq, but being consistently against the war in Iraq doesn't mean you're anti-war, not by any measurement (the current President can attest to that by his own actions).

How does supporting things that an overwhelming majority of the Senate supported make you "one of the worst Senators", exactly?

An overwhelming majority of the Senate backed PIPA? And if he's some kind of leftist superhero, isn't he supposed to oppose things the majority of the Senate does (a la Sanders)?
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2013, 10:41:48 AM »

If you are deeming him "one of the worst Senators", he'd have to have done at least one thing that is both bad and significantly far from the Senate mainstream.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_IP_Act
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2013, 11:37:14 AM »

If you are deeming him "one of the worst Senators", he'd have to have done at least one thing that is both bad and significantly far from the Senate mainstream.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_IP_Act

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Thanks for proving my point.

41<50.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2013, 12:03:55 PM »

If you are deeming him "one of the worst Senators", he'd have to have done at least one thing that is both bad and significantly far from the Senate mainstream.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_IP_Act

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Thanks for proving my point.

41<50.

So Brown is (according to your ludicrous logic) one of the 41 worst Senators. Such a big deal.

We haven't touched on his stance on trade, or his anti-2nd Amendment crazyness.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2013, 06:30:31 AM »

Gillibrand 3
Nelson 2
Stabenow 1
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #13 on: January 08, 2013, 03:44:39 PM »

Eliminate
Gillibrand 8

Save
Tester 4
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #14 on: January 09, 2013, 01:40:25 PM »

Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #15 on: January 10, 2013, 02:38:53 PM »

Eliminate Gillibrand

Save Tester
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2013, 06:24:50 AM »

Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #17 on: January 12, 2013, 10:13:14 AM »

Eliminate Sanders
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #18 on: January 14, 2013, 02:52:13 PM »

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 11 queries.