Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 34,466
|
 |
« on: August 20, 2014, 01:25:00 PM » |
|
Personally I think that the right to not have sex if you don't want to is more fundamental than the right to have sex if you do want to, and the existence of rape as a crime and conceptual category bears this out. Is sex something that anybody has the obligation to provide to you? If not (hint: It's not), in what sense is it a right? This isn't the same as there being a negative right not to have genuinely agreed-upon sex acts interfered with by third parties.
|
