Paul: Benghazi affair should disqualify Clinton from holding office again

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Rand Paul finds the August 6th 2001 memo perfectly acceptable to ignore. Why does anyone like this hypocrite?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

No, Iraq should disqualify Clinton from becoming President, but apparently all the "liberals" seem to be suffering from collective amnesia.

These purity tests are fun and all, but it's not like any Democrat in the future will be embarking on another Iraq. Hillary's vote and flip-flop are regrettable, but it won't be a problem in her hypothetical administration. Unreasonable ideological inflexibility is not going to cost us the woman who is (by far) our best bet at retaining the White House.

If she was in the minority of the party back in 2002 and defying Democratic leadership, it would be a different story. She wasn't a maverick on the issue; far too many Democrats made the wrong choice.

If they made the wrong choice before, they can make it again.  The exact same situation won't come up again, but it's worth questioning whether politicians have taken the right lessons from it.

History repeating itself? Nonsense!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_of_the_Spanish%E2%80%93American_War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Resolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Remind me which party cut the embassy security budget.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

New rule. Anyone who voted to cut the embassy security budget, and then whined about Benghazi should immediately be booted out of office and never allowed to talk about politics again.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Lets remember that Rand Paul is running as a Republican, its required that Benghazi must be brought up in the campaign. The entire overreaction by conservative forces and Fox News was meant to keep Hillary out of the white house.

They did try using it against Obama. It was hilarious how incompetent Candy Crowley was at attacking Obama during the debate.