Roe v Wade (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 12:25:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Roe v Wade (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: I'm waiting for that man.
#1
Sound		  
#2
Unsound		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 26

Author Topic: Roe v Wade  (Read 2557 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,986
« on: March 01, 2010, 01:56:06 PM »
Sound.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,986
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2010, 02:45:51 PM »
I continue to maintain the operative case is Griswold v Connecticut, which established the privacy penumbra, not Roe v Wade. If you accept Griswold as precedent it's virtually impossible not to accept Roe. And Griswold is quite deeply embedded. The only reason why it goes no attention is because it's not directly associated with a hot button political issue.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.