Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 08:27:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 ... 47
Author Topic: Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)  (Read 68958 times)
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #675 on: June 07, 2016, 11:31:37 PM »

Scored 75%. Only strategy was to give Trump the ones with a 3rd grade language level and Kirk the ones about serving.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #676 on: June 07, 2016, 11:37:43 PM »

Ok... not saying that Sanders will win Cali, but honestly there is a major over reaction to early VbM results  that were always expected to overwhelmingly favor Hillary.

For example early votes show Hillary winning Marin 63-36 and Sonoma 55-44 and SF 37-62, not even to speak elsewhere in the state.

These numbers are definitely impressive with early "vote-banking" and it looks like there is a decent chance that Hillary will win the state, but I ask those of you that are not residents of West Coast and heavily VbM states to automatically assume that the initial results that we are seeing is anywhere close to the final results.

I think you're right to a point - but I think you're over-thinking that Sanders can even get close at this stage.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,768
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #677 on: June 07, 2016, 11:38:47 PM »

So, is this going to be the first ever blonde vs blonde presidential election?
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #678 on: June 07, 2016, 11:40:47 PM »

Is California just going to be stuck until tomorrow or later?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,540
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #679 on: June 07, 2016, 11:41:01 PM »

So, is this going to be the first ever blonde vs blonde presidential election?


Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #680 on: June 07, 2016, 11:41:36 PM »

Also, Sanders has taken a strong lead in Oglala Lakota County, SD

Only 2/9 precincts are reporting there.  Clinton won the sparsely populated Cuny Table precinct, which I think is near Badlands National Park.  Sanders cleaned up in the more-populated Oglala.  Who wins the Pine Ridge precincts will likely dictate who wins the county.  I'm pretty sure it will be Sanders because he made a campaign stop in the county.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #681 on: June 07, 2016, 11:43:52 PM »

So, is this going to be the first ever blonde vs blonde presidential election?

(Blonde vs. bald)
Logged
Oak Hills
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,076
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #682 on: June 07, 2016, 11:43:58 PM »


I got 81%!
Logged
Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,385
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #683 on: June 07, 2016, 11:44:44 PM »

This was my prediction after New Hampshire:



Needless to say, I'm amazed Sanders got as far as he did. Tongue
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,829
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #684 on: June 07, 2016, 11:46:17 PM »

WTF. Why are there always so many errors and changes on these election nights? The vote transferring and reporting process really needs to be cleaned up in some places.

It's mostly just NM that is constantly editing stuff that they reported earlier. That's why the network call took so long, Santa Fe's vote total was jumping around and they had to verify that it wasn't going to suddenly give Sanders a win.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #685 on: June 07, 2016, 11:46:52 PM »

MT is looking a bit better for Sanders. Looks like Clinton's final loss in the '08 primary will be her final loss this year as well.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,829
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #686 on: June 07, 2016, 11:47:48 PM »

California still counting. Clinton up 62.2-36.7 with 14% in. Sanders ahead 48.7-46.6 in Montana with 35% in.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,809


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #687 on: June 07, 2016, 11:47:58 PM »

WTF. Why are there always so many errors and changes on these election nights? The vote transferring and reporting process really needs to be cleaned up in some places.

It's mostly just NM that is constantly editing stuff that they reported earlier. That's why the network call took so long, Santa Fe's vote total was jumping around and they had to verify that it wasn't going to suddenly give Sanders a win.

Well, NM isn't actually editing anything, the media just seems to have a hard time differentiating between "precincts partially reported" and "precincts completely reported" which some western states use.
Logged
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,705
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #688 on: June 07, 2016, 11:48:45 PM »

Why is South Dakota so split geographically?
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,978
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #689 on: June 07, 2016, 11:49:42 PM »

Why is South Dakota so split geographically?

Farm land vs. Ranch land.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #690 on: June 07, 2016, 11:49:54 PM »

Wonder when we'll see the CA call here.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #691 on: June 07, 2016, 11:50:44 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Santa Fe is out - that will shift back to Clinton.
Unless you've drilled down to the precincts out, Santa Fe County is basically 50/50 (tilt Clinton). ABQ is also out, and is 50/50 as well (tilt Sanders).

NM should pretty much hold as is.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #692 on: June 07, 2016, 11:52:06 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't see it shifting into the Sanders column at this point. Lead is too great.
Logged
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,705
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #693 on: June 07, 2016, 11:52:53 PM »

3 tied counties in MT!
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,809


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #694 on: June 07, 2016, 11:53:20 PM »

Bernie should win Montana. The post-absentee votes are more strongly in his favor than the early vote. Flathead flipped to him, Lewis and Clark will probably flip, and Yellowstone will likely narrow quite a bit.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #695 on: June 07, 2016, 11:54:01 PM »

No exit poll, they'll need more election day raw vote total is my guess. Clinton should obviously hold on.

CA can be frustrating with how slowly with the pace of how slowly the vote totals pour in.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,479
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #696 on: June 07, 2016, 11:56:00 PM »

Ok... not saying that Sanders will win Cali, but honestly there is a major over reaction to early VbM results  that were always expected to overwhelmingly favor Hillary.

For example early votes show Hillary winning Marin 63-36 and Sonoma 55-44 and SF 37-62, not even to speak elsewhere in the state.

These numbers are definitely impressive with early "vote-banking" and it looks like there is a decent chance that Hillary will win the state, but I ask those of you that are not residents of West Coast and heavily VbM states to automatically assume that the initial results that we are seeing is anywhere close to the final results.

I think you're right to a point - but I think you're over-thinking that Sanders can even get close at this stage.

Well, you are quite possibly correct considering the Early Vote (EV) lead in the Bay Area and obviously 65-35 early leads in Santa Clara and Contra Costa, not even to speak of SF and Marin county don't appear that margins can be overcome.

In SoCal we really have very little idea of numbers in LA County, as well as OC and SD county and the early vote in the Inland Empire is heavily dominated by older, wealthier voter.

Like I said earlier on another thread, Bernie needs to win the Bay Area by larger margins than Clinton in '08, basically tie in Sacramento, do very well in rural and small town NorCal, and basically eke out a small margin in SD/OC, while keeping Clinton margins down in LA County and the Inland Empire in order to win narrowly.

Even with the early votes numbers, not seeing this being a very easy scenario....
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #697 on: June 07, 2016, 11:56:37 PM »

Bernie's down by 13 with 14 in. I have him at 43.8 percent capped. This is over.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #698 on: June 07, 2016, 11:57:27 PM »

CA has been stuck at 33% reporting for a while now. Is this really all we're getting tonight? That's annoying.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,762
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #699 on: June 07, 2016, 11:58:00 PM »

Why is South Dakota so split geographically?

The east vs. west divide sure is something.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 ... 47  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 12 queries.