None of these. The Conservatives for truth would be the least of the evils, but as an LGBTQ+ atheist, I'd be voting against my own morals.
Imagine believing the religious right has anything tangible against those who wish to abstain from sexual activity.
Asexuality =/= celibacy
In practice, they are the same.
Celibacy = Consciously choosing to abstain from sex or marriage
Asexuality = Having little to no sexual attraction toward either sex. Some asexuals are ok with sex, but the attraction just isn't there, while some aren't. Also, romantic attraction is different from sexual attraction in that it's about who they'd have a relationship with or date vs. have sex with. Some asexuals can still be heteroromantic (I have a friend who is a heteroromantic ace), homoromantic, biromantic, aromantic, etc. Some asexuals do get married and some even have kids.
Even still, I don’t see how the religious right would have any problem with a person who lacks sexual attraction towards people. Even if it’s some really weird denomination that thinks everyone is purposed to marry and have a family, as you said, ace people get married and have kids all the time,
Poll
