Nevada Democratic Caucus Result

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Some Nevada polls would be great.

What are you talking about? We have Gravis and Overtime.

I'm seriously craving some ARG rn. Don't know if they poll Nevada, but the entertainment factor would multiply by ten if they started.

You're in luck, we have a new poll out. The results came in quickly because it's an Undertime Politics poll.

Clinton 49
Sanders 45

Trump 39
Rubio 21
Cruz 14
Bush 9
Carson 6
Kasich 4

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Will they actually have vote totals or are they stupid like Iowa

They're stupid like Iowa.  Here's an explanation of the 2008 Democratic process in Nevada, which as I understand is basically the same as the 2016 process:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevada_Democratic_caucuses,_2008#Results

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Even worse, Nevada didn't report by congressional district in 2008, and the estimates of national delegates was wrong, Obama ended up winning them despite losing the state.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Some Nevada polls would be great.

What are you talking about? We have Gravis and Overtime.

I'm seriously craving some ARG rn. Don't know if they poll Nevada, but the entertainment factor would multiply by ten if they started.

You're in luck, we have a new poll out. The results came in quickly because it's an Undertime Politics poll.

Clinton 49
Sanders 45

Trump 39
Rubio 21
Cruz 14
Bush 9
Carson 6
Kasich 4

I'd prefer an actual poll as opposed to imaginary numbers.

We'd do imaginary numbers, but that would be too complex, so we're keeping it real.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Some Nevada polls would be great.

What are you talking about? We have Gravis and Overtime.

I'm seriously craving some ARG rn. Don't know if they poll Nevada, but the entertainment factor would multiply by ten if they started.

You're in luck, we have a new poll out. The results came in quickly because it's an Undertime Politics poll.

Clinton 49
Sanders 45

Trump 39
Rubio 21
Cruz 14
Bush 9
Carson 6
Kasich 4

I'd prefer an actual poll as opposed to imaginary numbers.

Some Nevada polls would be great.

What are you talking about? We have Gravis and Overtime.

I'm seriously craving some ARG rn. Don't know if they poll Nevada, but the entertainment factor would multiply by ten if they started.

You're in luck, we have a new poll out. The results came in quickly because it's an Undertime Politics poll.

Clinton 49
Sanders 45

Trump 39
Rubio 21
Cruz 14
Bush 9
Carson 6
Kasich 4

I'd prefer an actual poll as opposed to imaginary numbers.

Ya know, Overtime has been... actually pretty good in both of the first two contests, unless you want to kill them for the IA GOP caucus which even Selzer got wrong.  So who the hell knows?  Wasn't PPP a newbie on the scene in 2008, and pretty much torn to shreds around here due to that D next to the name, but turned out to be really good?  Nevada, or any MST state for that matter, isn't nor has ever been what one would call "Clinton-country".  And wouldn't the Dem electorate in NV skew younger?  I don't think 49-45 Clinton is terribly far off from reality.  I'd going to bullish and say it's quite close to reality.  

No, this isn't Overtime. They're too slow. Undertime gets results quick. Real quick.