TIMELINE: 2016 on (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 09:47:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  TIMELINE: 2016 on (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TIMELINE: 2016 on  (Read 28726 times)
Morning in Atlas
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,172
United States


« on: December 03, 2013, 01:03:23 PM »
« edited: December 03, 2013, 01:43:09 PM by Sawx. »

Hrrm. I hope the timeline won't be a total Republican-lovefest. It would be a shame - I like the detail.

I don't think it's turning into a GOP wank quite yet. It's a good timeline, just have a few issues with it:

  • I could see Manchin cross-endorsing, but Graham and Bayh would never endorse Christie over Cuomo. Cuomo's fairly centrist/moderate heroish himself, plus all three of them are New Democrats. Two of the party's founders would never betray one of their own.
  • You only briefly go over two races (and don't even tell us how one turns out) for Senate. I'd like to see more of it - I'm wondering if Christie's moderate credentials could carry a few purple staters and even Kirk.
  • Just a few leadership issues. Blackburn would never ascend to Speakership - McCarthy's seen as the heir apparent, and if they want a woman, they have McMorris Rodgers, who already beat her for a leadership post. I have a bit of trouble seeing the Dems nominate McCaskill, who's arguably the most vulnerable Senator in 2018.
Logged
Morning in Atlas
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,172
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2013, 03:11:23 PM »

I find it a little hard to believe that New Mexico would vote for Martinez more than Arkansas would.
Logged
Morning in Atlas
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,172
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2013, 01:29:41 AM »

Y'all are just finding out that this is a Christie wank? A well-constructed wank, but nevertheless a wank.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.