2010 Primaries Thread (It's all over now, baby blue)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 11:50:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2010 Primaries Thread (It's all over now, baby blue)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 ... 90
Author Topic: 2010 Primaries Thread (It's all over now, baby blue)  (Read 181000 times)
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1175 on: August 25, 2010, 07:04:26 PM »
« edited: August 25, 2010, 07:10:59 PM by cinyc »

Is Vermont set in stone for a Shumlin win?

Good question.  Shumlin won the precinct count.  I'm sure it's close enough for a recount, but I don't know the Vermont laws.   I'll try to look at the Burlington Free Press and TV station websites to see what they say about absentees and the like.

Edited to add: The Burlington Free Press says that Markowitz or Racine can ask for a recount, since both are within 2 points of Shumlin.
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20100824/NEWS03/100824023/1095/Shumlin-Looks-like-we-ve-won

I've found nothing about absentees as of yet.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1176 on: August 25, 2010, 07:16:03 PM »

They held a unity rally today, I did some Google news searches & blog checks a few hours ago, didn't see anything that contained any drama
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1177 on: August 25, 2010, 07:30:23 PM »

Why don't the AP just call Alaska?
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1178 on: August 25, 2010, 07:35:43 PM »

Because, as has been discussed on the past five or six pages, there are still thousands of absentee ballots yet to be counted.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1179 on: August 25, 2010, 07:47:50 PM »

Because, as has been discussed on the past five or six pages, there are still thousands of absentee ballots yet to be counted.

There may be some questioned votes, too - but likely not many.

AP hasn't called VT-Gov-D yet, either, for the same reasons.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1180 on: August 25, 2010, 07:48:10 PM »

Is Vermont set in stone for a Shumlin win?

Good question.  Shumlin won the precinct count.  I'm sure it's close enough for a recount, but I don't know the Vermont laws.   I'll try to look at the Burlington Free Press and TV station websites to see what they say about absentees and the like.

Edited to add: The Burlington Free Press says that Markowitz or Racine can ask for a recount, since both are within 2 points of Shumlin.
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20100824/NEWS03/100824023/1095/Shumlin-Looks-like-we-ve-won

I've found nothing about absentees as of yet.

The secretary of state's website says the canvassing board will meet next Tuesday to finalize the results.

As far as absentee voting is concerned, Vermont seems to be full-service. Seriously, Ken Blackwell's head would explode if he read that.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1181 on: August 25, 2010, 07:59:53 PM »

The secretary of state's website says the canvassing board will meet next Tuesday to finalize the results.

As far as absentee voting is concerned, Vermont seems to be full-service. Seriously, Ken Blackwell's head would explode if he read that.

Full service, but absentees had to be returned by election day to be counted.  So Racine and Markowitz are hoping transcribing errors will put them over the top.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,061
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1182 on: August 25, 2010, 08:22:39 PM »
« Edited: August 25, 2010, 08:25:09 PM by Torie »

Yes, Cinyc, I note the crazies in Eagle went 2-1 for the insurgent. If you want to read about Eagle, read John McPhee's superb book, Coming into the Country. Man that man knows how to write. It is almost prose poetry - spare and eloquent, with every word carrying its weight, with exactly the right word used, time after time. He has a gift.

You know, if you really want to learn how to write well, read books by folks who really know how to write. Just a thought.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,697
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1183 on: August 25, 2010, 08:23:14 PM »

This is too bad. Sad Murkowski was one of my favorite Senators.
that's odd, i thought you'd prefer Indiana pork to Alaskan.
anyway I do hope Miller keeps his lead. If elected, he will bring back the representation of facial hair to the Senate.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1184 on: August 25, 2010, 08:40:30 PM »

With 438 of 438 in:

Joe Miller (R)   47,027   50.90%
Lisa Murkowski (R)   45,359   49.10%

Miller +1,668. 

And now, the absentees, (possible) questioned votes, and the question of whether the Libertarian candidate jumps out of the race to let Murkowski run on the Libertarian line should she decide that's the course she wants to take....
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,061
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1185 on: August 25, 2010, 08:43:24 PM »

With 438 of 438 in:

Joe Miller (R)   47,027   50.90%
Lisa Murkowski (R)   45,359   49.10%

Miller +1,668. 

And now, the absentees, (possible) questioned votes, and the question of whether the Libertarian candidate jumps out of the race to let Murkowski run on the Libertarian line should she decide that's the course she wants to take....

Murkowski running as a Libertarian? LOL.  I mean, does she have any more libertarian instincts than I do (to wit, not much on the issues in play out there)? 
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,760
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1186 on: August 25, 2010, 08:48:43 PM »

This is too bad. Sad Murkowski was one of my favorite Senators.
that's odd, i thought you'd prefer Indiana pork to Alaskan.
anyway I do hope Miller keeps his lead. If elected, he will bring back the representation of facial hair to the Senate.

Yeah, that's an important constituency.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1187 on: August 25, 2010, 09:12:08 PM »

This is too bad. Sad Murkowski was one of my favorite Senators.
that's odd, i thought you'd prefer Indiana pork to Alaskan.
anyway I do hope Miller keeps his lead. If elected, he will bring back the representation of facial hair to the Senate.

Yeah, that's an important constituency.

As someone with facial hair, I approve.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1188 on: August 25, 2010, 09:21:14 PM »

With 438 of 438 in:

Joe Miller (R)   47,027   50.90%
Lisa Murkowski (R)   45,359   49.10%

Miller +1,668. 

And now, the absentees, (possible) questioned votes, and the question of whether the Libertarian candidate jumps out of the race to let Murkowski run on the Libertarian line should she decide that's the course she wants to take....

Murkowski running as a Libertarian? LOL.  I mean, does she have any more libertarian instincts than I do (to wit, not much on the issues in play out there)? 

Yeah, she'd be a big government Libertarian.  Kind of an oxymoron.  But, as I understand it, it's her only way on the November ballot.  Murkowski is too late to run on her own independent line.  The Alaskan Independence Party didn't run a candidate, which means she can't do an AIP switcheroo.   So it's either get the Libertarian to back out and run on that line, wage a write-in campaign, or fold.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,782


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1189 on: August 25, 2010, 09:27:49 PM »

I assume that Miller doesn't want to cut Alaskan pork. So by smaller government, I assume he means that California just sends money directly to Alaska?

Anyways, the electorate seems to be in a bit of an anti-incumbent mood. I would have much rather McCain lost instead of Murkowski, of course.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1190 on: August 25, 2010, 09:30:25 PM »

I didn't catch this last night, but Vermont Democrats nominated a gay man for Lt. Governor. There was also a gay candidate for Auditor, but he lost the primary.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1191 on: August 25, 2010, 09:38:28 PM »

FWIW, the residents of Stevens Village cast 6 total votes, all in the combined Democrat-AIP-Libertarian primary.  0 votes were supposedly cast in the Republican primary.  All of Miller's gains came from Snoeshoe, which he won by 193.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,061
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1192 on: August 25, 2010, 09:39:34 PM »

I didn't catch this last night, but Vermont Democrats nominated a gay man for Lt. Governor. There was also a gay candidate for Auditor, but he lost the primary.

CA back when elected a gay man to the worthless Lt Governor spot: Mike Curb. Of course we also elected a gay governor, until I guess he decided to marry a beard.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1193 on: August 25, 2010, 09:41:25 PM »

Lisa Murkowski is about as libertarian as Generalissimo Franco, so that's not going to happen.

I didn't catch this last night, but Vermont Democrats nominated a gay man for Lt. Governor. There was also a gay candidate for Auditor, but he lost the primary.

Massachusetts Republicans nominated a gay man for Lt. Governor . . .

(Well, at the party convention, but I think he's unopposed in the primary).
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1194 on: August 25, 2010, 09:42:40 PM »

I used to be on Joe Miller's email list.  It was really boring and painful to read so it was one of the few  I'm unsubscribed from.  Maybe  I shouldn't  have.
Logged
Thomas D
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,043
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1195 on: August 25, 2010, 09:49:46 PM »

I didn't catch this last night, but Vermont Democrats nominated a gay man for Lt. Governor. There was also a gay candidate for Auditor, but he lost the primary.

CA back when elected a gay man to the worthless Lt Governor spot: Mike Curb. Of course we also elected a gay governor, until I guess he decided to marry a beard.

Reagan Huh
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,061
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1196 on: August 25, 2010, 09:51:09 PM »

I didn't catch this last night, but Vermont Democrats nominated a gay man for Lt. Governor. There was also a gay candidate for Auditor, but he lost the primary.

CA back when elected a gay man to the worthless Lt Governor spot: Mike Curb. Of course we also elected a gay governor, until I guess he decided to marry a beard.

Reagan Huh

Nope.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1197 on: August 25, 2010, 09:54:25 PM »

I always like to see where the absentees come from before saying too much, but Murkowski is toast imo.
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1198 on: August 25, 2010, 10:00:08 PM »
« Edited: August 25, 2010, 10:10:21 PM by Kevinstat »

Might the absentee votes in Vermont have been counted within the municipalities and the totals added to the election day at polling place totals within that municipality before the municipality reported results?

The way people talk about absentee votes on this site makes me wonder if they are counted very differently in much of the country than they are in Maine.  In Maine, when a town reports results, those results include the absentee votes.  Perhaps the "regular" votes are counted first but the absentee and early ballots that aren't challenged (and challenges can happen when people go to vote in person; I remember reading that in 2000 Republicans in Brunswick challenged a bunch of voters from Bowdoin College who may have owed their residency to their dorm room, which Maine's constitution makes clear does not give people the right to suffrage but it may be interpreted as allowing state or local law (and constitutional state laws trump local laws) to allow college students living in the dorms to vote in the municipality where their dorm is)... anyway, I think combined unofficial (but becoming official in races where recounts are not requested) totals including absentee, early and regular ballots are arrived at in the single precinct municipalities and there's no distinguishing the different kinds of ballots if someone views the results after they are official.  Most (if not all now, the one exeption I recall from past elections closed its second polling place a couple years ago or more) of the municipalities with multiple precincts have a separate "central voting" precinct which presumably covers absentees and early voting.  (In 2008, Maine had early voting for some municipalities where I assume voters actually put the ballots directly in the ballot box rather than an absentee ballot which they sealed and put in the ballot box.  My municipality didin't have early voting but I've voted absentee at the town office before election day multiple times and the clerk or assistant clerk fills out most of the absentee ballot envelope for you and you have to do little more than sign, probably date (I don't remember) and seal it before giving it to the clerk or assistant clerk who reviews the envolope and tells you you're all set (the first time I voted that way, when the clerk didn't fill out as much, there was one thing that I'd missed that the clerk pointed out gave the envelope back to me to fill out).)

So when all the precincts are in and people ask, "what about the absentees," I think to myself, "aren't they included within the municipal results?"  To those who know, how does counting different kind of ballots work in states where you know how it works?
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1199 on: August 25, 2010, 10:12:35 PM »

Wow, okay. I wasn't expecting to wake up to Murkowski trailing.

Also, Ben Quayle? Really, AZ-03?

I know likely a Democrat hold on the seat. I was expecting Gorman to have won actually with all her buzz.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 ... 90  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 9 queries.