2010 Primaries Thread (It's all over now, baby blue)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 07, 2024, 12:04:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2010 Primaries Thread (It's all over now, baby blue)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 ... 90
Author Topic: 2010 Primaries Thread (It's all over now, baby blue)  (Read 181039 times)
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1025 on: August 24, 2010, 10:43:46 PM »

and genuine man who will be great for Oklahoma and bring the change to Washington that is desperately needed.

lol, you really are the kind of person that believes political propaganda.

Only because I know this guy personally.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1026 on: August 24, 2010, 10:44:34 PM »

Wow great job Arizona 3rd. Another Quayle might be closer to congress after tonight. Tongue
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1027 on: August 24, 2010, 10:45:36 PM »

It's all that McCalister's fault for being a spoiler to McCollum. I won't support a Republican if they are shady, discriminatory, or extremist i.e. Deal and Scott.

Who's the one that paid for a political endorsement?
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1028 on: August 24, 2010, 10:46:18 PM »

Shumlin's lead cut to 90. Calais, Hyde Park and Charlotte all gave net votes to Racine. Shumlin should be praying for a miracle in St Albans.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1029 on: August 24, 2010, 10:46:38 PM »

Republicans should prefer all Republican governors to Democratic this year, for the simple fact that governors control redistricting and have a bully pulpit to promote and organize their party for presidential elections.  Florida, as one of the states with the highest number of congressional districts, and probably the most important swing state, is absolutely crucial to Republican success.

 Some people also consider governing in their prefs
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1030 on: August 24, 2010, 10:47:33 PM »

and genuine man who will be great for Oklahoma and bring the change to Washington that is desperately needed.

lol, you really are the kind of person that believes political propaganda.

Only because I know this guy personally.

I haven't seen many mainstream politicians you don't like, to be honest. No matter how far left or right.
Logged
nhmagic
azmagic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,097
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.62, S: 4.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1031 on: August 24, 2010, 10:56:32 PM »

Each of the three competitive AZ dems are going to lose their seats.  That is as clear as ever from the republican turnout so far in the primary. 

AZ1-30725 DEM / 55314 REP
AZ5-18230 DEM / 39687 REP
AZ8-33979 DEM / 47590 REP
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1032 on: August 24, 2010, 11:09:34 PM »

Some people also consider governing in their prefs

They shouldn't if they're out-of-state.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,546


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1033 on: August 24, 2010, 11:11:02 PM »

Each of the three competitive AZ dems are going to lose their seats.  That is as clear as ever from the republican turnout so far in the primary. 

AZ1-30725 DEM / 55314 REP
AZ5-18230 DEM / 39687 REP
AZ8-33979 DEM / 47590 REP


A little presumptious, considering that Democrats had no primary and no reason to show up.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1034 on: August 24, 2010, 11:12:53 PM »

Each of the three competitive AZ dems are going to lose their seats.  That is as clear as ever from the republican turnout so far in the primary. 

AZ1-30725 DEM / 55314 REP
AZ5-18230 DEM / 39687 REP
AZ8-33979 DEM / 47590 REP


A little presumptious, considering that Democrats had no primary and no reason to show up.

Huh?  They have a contested Senate primary.
Logged
ajc0918
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,915
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1035 on: August 24, 2010, 11:15:02 PM »
« Edited: August 24, 2010, 11:19:47 PM by ajc0918 »

Florida Senate Turnout
Democrats: 898,032
Republicans: 1,242,959

Florida Governor:
Democrats: 852,028
Republicans: 1,272,707

Not very good news for the democrats if this is seen in November. Especially since democrats outnumber republicans in Florida by 600,000.

Oh and for FL-25 since some of you are talking about the chances of a democrat pick up:
FL-25 Turnout:
Democrats: 15,663
Republicans: 29,059

Another interesting one:
FL-13 Turnout:
Democrats: 32,291
Republicans: 73,662


Oh and Rubio is the only GOP Senate candidate to get over 1,000,000 votes in the primary. Fiorina got like 980,000 votes.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1036 on: August 24, 2010, 11:15:39 PM »

and genuine man who will be great for Oklahoma and bring the change to Washington that is desperately needed.

lol, you really are the kind of person that believes political propaganda.

Only because I know this guy personally.

I haven't seen many mainstream politicians you don't like, to be honest. No matter how far left or right.

Probably because I try to see the good in people, and don't look for the bad.  I've had this mindset my entire life, and it's served me well most of the time.  I like far left individuals like the late Ted Kennedy and John Murtha and Nancy Pelosi, but i also like the far right individuals like Sally Kern and Strom Thurmond.  I even like Jim Inhofe as a person, just not as a politician.  Now, liking a person doesn't mean I care for their politics too well, but I even like to find one thing with them I do agree on rather than trying to find the one thing where I don't agree with them.

As far as James Lankford, I've met this guy personally and he has a really soft and caring heart.  He will be a good Congressman and he will make a lot of friends on both sides of the aisle because of his charm and his charisma.  If he weren't in the US House, I'd almost ask the powers that be to consider him as the chaplain for the House or the Senate.
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1037 on: August 24, 2010, 11:21:03 PM »

Vermont's been at 226 of 260 precincts in according to the AP for almost (if not over) 10 minutes now.  Shumlin leads Racine by 245 votes.
Logged
nhmagic
azmagic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,097
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.62, S: 4.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1038 on: August 24, 2010, 11:22:15 PM »

Each of the three competitive AZ dems are going to lose their seats.  That is as clear as ever from the republican turnout so far in the primary. 

AZ1-30725 DEM / 55314 REP
AZ5-18230 DEM / 39687 REP
AZ8-33979 DEM / 47590 REP


A little presumptious, considering that Democrats had no primary and no reason to show up.

If you knew the democrats had even a 50/50 shot you would have blasted my comment - the fact that you only call it a little presumptious is almost evidence enough you agree.  I know that you cant interpret primary results and apply it to the general, but there is enough of a turnout gap to show an obvious wave incoming.  You have to also remember that dems rarely if ever have a contentious primary in AZ, they just solidify around a candidate and hope into the wind that they get lucky - its just the way AZ works.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1039 on: August 24, 2010, 11:22:56 PM »


I haven't seen many mainstream politicians you don't like, to be honest. No matter how far left or right.

Probably because I try to see the good in people, and don't look for the bad.  I've had this mindset my entire life, and it's served me well most of the time.

Except for when it leads to you repeatedly falling for scams.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,546


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1040 on: August 24, 2010, 11:26:05 PM »

Each of the three competitive AZ dems are going to lose their seats.  That is as clear as ever from the republican turnout so far in the primary. 

AZ1-30725 DEM / 55314 REP
AZ5-18230 DEM / 39687 REP
AZ8-33979 DEM / 47590 REP



A little presumptious, considering that Democrats had no primary and no reason to show up.

Huh?  They have a contested Senate primary.

A Senate primary with a couple of joke candidates that everyone knows have no chance of beating McCain.
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1041 on: August 24, 2010, 11:27:33 PM »

Northern Vermont's preferred candidate, Paul Beaudry, won out in the battle for the Republican sacrificial lamb against Peter Welch in November.  Or is Welch seen as vulnerable for some reason?
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,987
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1042 on: August 24, 2010, 11:32:27 PM »

Each of the three competitive AZ dems are going to lose their seats.  That is as clear as ever from the republican turnout so far in the primary. 

AZ1-30725 DEM / 55314 REP
AZ5-18230 DEM / 39687 REP
AZ8-33979 DEM / 47590 REP
There aren't many registered Democrats in AZ-5, just many swing voters that vote for Mitchell. In AZ-1, the Democratic base is composed of Natives and Hispanics. If there is going to be low turnout in November, their turnout is going to be bottoming out for a primary that little care about. In AZ-8 the gap isn't too severe.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1043 on: August 24, 2010, 11:32:51 PM »

Vermont's been at 226 of 260 precincts in according to the AP for almost (if not over) 10 minutes now.  Shumlin leads Racine by 245 votes.

Two precincts came in and Shumlin's lead is down to 30.  Shelburne (near Burlington) was one of the two towns.  Still nothing from St. Albans city or town.
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1044 on: August 24, 2010, 11:33:30 PM »

Rather useless information now, but Shumlin's lead was down to 75 votes after the 227th precint came in.
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1045 on: August 24, 2010, 11:34:58 PM »

One more precinct in and Shumlin adds a vote to his lead.  You gotta love New England elections.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1046 on: August 24, 2010, 11:37:31 PM »

This was before the last precinct came in:



Bartlett took another town, Hyde Park.  An island of orange.
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1047 on: August 24, 2010, 11:51:15 PM »

Still 229 precincts in, but now Shumlin is up by 35 votes.  The town results page had gone back to 228 earlier, and perhaps that withdrawn town isn't in the APs results now while the other town is.  Wierd.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1048 on: August 24, 2010, 11:52:17 PM »
« Edited: August 24, 2010, 11:56:01 PM by cinyc »

Still 229 precincts in, but now Shumlin is up by 35 votes.  The town results page had gone back to 228 earlier, and perhaps that withdrawn town isn't in the APs results now while the other town is.  Wierd.

230 came in - and Racine's up by 13 votes.  I'm not sure what it was - it wasn't St. Albans.

Edit: Fairfield, next to St. Albans.  Shumlin got slaughtered in a two way race between Racine and Markowitz.
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1049 on: August 24, 2010, 11:57:16 PM »

Still 229 precincts in, but now Shumlin is up by 35 votes.  The town results page had gone back to 228 earlier, and perhaps that withdrawn town isn't in the APs results now while the other town is.  Wierd.

230 came in - and Racine's up by 13 votes.  I'm not sure what it was - it wasn't St. Albans.

Edit: Fairfield, next to St. Albans.  Shumlin got slaughtered in a two way race between Racine and Markowitz.

I had just figured out it was Fairfield myself.  I have to go to bed, but this has been fun.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 ... 90  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 12 queries.