Senate/House Polling Hype Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 01:28:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Senate/House Polling Hype Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Senate/House Polling Hype Thread  (Read 3570 times)
DemocraticKing
Rookie
**
Posts: 92


« on: June 18, 2018, 08:33:05 AM »

Gravis is going to release IN/FL polls soon. Given how D-friendly they’ve been in those states in the past, I’m gonna guess Donnelly +12 and Nelson +7 or something like that.

Finally! A post-primary public poll in Indiana.

As for Florida, I think I said before that I would need three polls in a row to have a Nelson lead of +4 or higher, or 3 similarly-sized Scott leads in a row, to change my perception of the race from Tilts D.

There are 3 polls with Scott +4 or more:

5/28 FAU Scott +4:  https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/national-govt--politics/fau-poll-scott-edging-nelson-senate-race-trump-approval/f1R3VtiD14RG4HwpjeQ5iI/
       
6/4 Cherry Communications. Scott +5: https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/SENATE/2018/polls.php?type=src&source_id=179

6/11. Morning Consult. Scott +1: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/11/florida-senate-scott-nelson-poll-635358

6/12 St. Leo University Scott +6: http://sunshinestatenews.com/story/rick-scott-holds-solid-lead-over-bill-nelson-new-poll

So, do you change from tilt D

At worst for Scott based on actual Florida polls it is a toss up.   At best tilt R





This list could double as a sampling of bad pollsters.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.