Most annoying "normie" political takes ? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 02:41:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Most annoying "normie" political takes ? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Most annoying "normie" political takes ?  (Read 4457 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,475


« on: August 12, 2022, 01:16:25 AM »

Voters attribute almost thaumaturgical powers over the economy to the incumbent President. This is like rule #1 of American presidential elections.

"Muh bipartisanship" used to be another one, but these days that's increasingly perceived as beltwaybrain and the normie position across the fruited plain is instead "anyone who disagrees with me on an issue I regard as high-salience is literally Jeffrey Dahmer".
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,475


« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2022, 10:06:54 PM »

Left wingers. like all classes of people, think that their views are normative and applicable to everyone.

Never mind that in um, say, the last British general election, it was a SECRET ballot, and that in the privacy of the voting booth there is NO pressure or fear of reprisal and the ordinary voters can cast their ballot as they think.

"Some people have normative political principles and sometimes those principles aren't winning ones at the polls" is a normal thing to notice, sure, and annoying because of what a pointless statement of the obvious it is.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,475


« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2022, 12:32:09 AM »

Left wingers. like all classes of people, think that their views are normative and applicable to everyone.

Never mind that in um, say, the last British general election, it was a SECRET ballot, and that in the privacy of the voting booth there is NO pressure or fear of reprisal and the ordinary voters can cast their ballot as they think.

"Some people have normative political principles and sometimes those principles aren't winning ones at the polls" is a normal thing to notice, sure, and annoying because of what a pointless statement of the obvious it is.

well obviously they are not normative or they wouldn't poll so poorly once people are in the privacy of the booth, rather than talking publically to pollsters. This is true whether you are Millitant Tendency in 1983 or Jeremy Corbyn once he was no longer lucky enough to be facing Ms. May.

What do you think the word "normative" means, exactly? It's not a highfalutin way of saying "normal".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.