GeorgeBFree
Npard23
Rookie
Posts: 55
|
 |
« on: July 08, 2020, 05:48:34 PM » |
|
|
« edited: July 08, 2020, 07:48:34 PM by Npard23 »
|
Major metro areas where cities + suburbs are historically bipartisan. It will be much more time and cost efficient to target larger metro over rural voters. The metros that come to mind include. This is all not big cities. Those overwhelming one side such as Boston, Salt Lake, OKC, DC, NY, Chicago, and SF will not be campaigned as they are ideologically rigid or have strong local political machines.
Southern California (LA+OC+San Diego)- 2nd largest metro ares that has enough ideological diversity worth campaigning. Republicans could get 50% of this vote in a good year.
South Florida (Miami and Suburbs)- Miami has history of electing Republicans on Congressional level despite being blue county presidential
Dallas, TX, Phoenix AZ, Houston TX, Atlanta, GA- Historically red metros turning more blue with growth (plenty of voters on both sides)
Pittsburgh PA, Cincinnati, OH- opposite case of cities mentioned above
Honorable Mentions: San Antonio, Denver, Cleveland, Minneapolis
|
