FL/OH- CNN: Trump +3 and +5 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 05:01:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  FL/OH- CNN: Trump +3 and +5 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FL/OH- CNN: Trump +3 and +5  (Read 8152 times)
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


« on: September 14, 2016, 06:22:14 PM »

I read that cnn forgot to poll anyone under 50. Is this true?

Probably not, but if it was it would be funny.

Edit: Wait WTF?

18- 35- 50- Under 45 and
 Total 34 49 64 65+ 45 Older
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------
Clinton, the Democrat 44% N/A N/A 42% 39% N/A 42%
Trump, the Republican 47% N/A N/A 48% 56% N/A 51%
Johnson, the Libertarian 6% N/A N/A 7% 3% N/A 4%
Stein, the Green party 1% N/A N/A 1% * N/A 1%
None * N/A N/A * 1% N/A 1%
Other * N/A N/A * * N/A *
No opinion 1% N/A N/A 1% 1% N/A 1%
Sampling Error +/-3.5 +/-6.0 +/-5.0 +/-4.0
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2016, 06:28:54 PM »

They're also missing voters in Cleveland lol
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2016, 06:35:14 PM »

They're also missing voters in Cleveland lol
No that means that the margin of error is too high to show results.

Is it the same for voters under 50?
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2016, 06:46:23 PM »

I'd say us but they have the Under-45 Crosstab in the Ohio poll which shows Clinton:41 Trump:39 Johnson:13 Stein:4

With a margin of error more than double those 46+. In fact they polled more people over 65 than under 45. There are no results for those 18-34 or 35-49. An in Florida, there are low numbers for Tampa Bay and rural Florida that cause them to often have a sample size too small to show. Obviously with such small sample sizes, even if it is reweighted, the results are bound to be misleading and will likely be at least a little bit off. So, this poll is junk. I'm not saying it's rigged, that should be obvious to those who can read, but the subsamples have messed up the poll.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.