Why did Little River County, AR swung so hard to the Republicans in 2008? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 02:29:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why did Little River County, AR swung so hard to the Republicans in 2008? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Little River County, AR swung so hard to the Republicans in 2008?  (Read 15823 times)
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
« on: June 09, 2019, 11:07:52 PM »

LMAO @ Red Avs saying racism. Do you people ever get tired of bringing race into everything?
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2019, 11:15:17 PM »

LMAO @ Red Avs saying racism. Do you people ever get tired of bringing race into everything?

People don’t vote for what they want. They vote for who they are.

And who they are, are yellow dogs finally waking up to the democratic party being too socially liberal for their interests. Race was not in these peoples heads at the voting booth.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2019, 11:32:23 PM »

LMAO @ Red Avs saying racism. Do you people ever get tired of bringing race into everything?

People don’t vote for what they want. They vote for who they are.

And who they are, are yellow dogs finally waking up to the democratic party being too socially liberal for their interests. Race was not in these peoples heads at the voting booth.

This is delusional. John Kerry was more socially liberal than Obama and he did pretty well with yellow dogs. keep in mind he was also painted as a "Massachusetts liberal", a "coastal elitist" and so on. as I said before, there are very few logical explanations for why so many voters would switch from Kerry to McCain other than racism.

You are missing the point. Sure, Kerry was more socially liberal than Obama, but it's all about the time and how long of a time trends take place over. 2000-2004 R swings were just as strong in these areas. It's not about race, it's about policy realignment.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2019, 11:25:35 AM »

LMAO @ Red Avs saying racism. Do you people ever get tired of bringing race into everything?

People don’t vote for what they want. They vote for who they are.

And who they are, are yellow dogs finally waking up to the democratic party being too socially liberal for their interests. Race was not in these peoples heads at the voting booth.

This is delusional. John Kerry was more socially liberal than Obama and he did pretty well with yellow dogs. keep in mind he was also painted as a "Massachusetts liberal", a "coastal elitist" and so on. as I said before, there are very few logical explanations for why so many voters would switch from Kerry to McCain other than racism.

You are missing the point. Sure, Kerry was more socially liberal than Obama, but it's all about the time and how long of a time trends take place over. 2000-2004 R swings were just as strong in these areas. It's not about race, it's about policy realignment.

Sure, it's just a coincidence that polls showed Hillary winning states like West Virginia and Arkansas vs McCain in 2008, and then they overwhelmingly rejected a black man - but surely not because he was black and had a scary sounding name.

LMAO, did you even pay attention to 90s and early 00s politics? Hillary was seen as similar to Bill on the issues which made southern dems more comfortable. Obama was different and was unarguably more socially liberal than Clinton was.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2019, 12:05:12 PM »

LMAO @ Red Avs saying racism. Do you people ever get tired of bringing race into everything?

People don’t vote for what they want. They vote for who they are.

And who they are, are yellow dogs finally waking up to the democratic party being too socially liberal for their interests. Race was not in these peoples heads at the voting booth.

This is delusional. John Kerry was more socially liberal than Obama and he did pretty well with yellow dogs. keep in mind he was also painted as a "Massachusetts liberal", a "coastal elitist" and so on. as I said before, there are very few logical explanations for why so many voters would switch from Kerry to McCain other than racism.

You are missing the point. Sure, Kerry was more socially liberal than Obama, but it's all about the time and how long of a time trends take place over. 2000-2004 R swings were just as strong in these areas. It's not about race, it's about policy realignment.

Sure, it's just a coincidence that polls showed Hillary winning states like West Virginia and Arkansas vs McCain in 2008, and then they overwhelmingly rejected a black man - but surely not because he was black and had a scary sounding name.

LMAO, did you even pay attention to 90s and early 00s politics? Hillary was seen as similar to Bill on the issues which made southern dems more comfortable. Obama was different and was unarguably more socially liberal than Clinton was.

Except Obama and Hillary were virtually the same on every issue...

Hillary was less socially liberal, or at least she presented herself that way.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2019, 08:38:39 PM »

LMAO @ Red Avs saying racism. Do you people ever get tired of bringing race into everything?

Sure dude, I'm sure they swung Republican by 30% in 2008 of all years because they agreed with the Republican Party's economic agenda

That's a very possible reason.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
« Reply #6 on: August 15, 2019, 11:24:37 PM »

LMAO @ Red Avs saying racism. Do you people ever get tired of bringing race into everything?

Sure dude, I'm sure they swung Republican by 30% in 2008 of all years because they agreed with the Republican Party's economic agenda

That's a very possible reason.

I take it you’ve never spent any real amount of time interacting with people in the rural south

Clearly you haven't, despite being in Texas. Are you a hermit or something?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.