Idea for Redistricting Reform (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 04:00:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Idea for Redistricting Reform (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Idea for Redistricting Reform  (Read 1930 times)
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,788
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« on: December 08, 2020, 10:07:01 PM »

Moving east to west and north to south.
New England's one-district states go first.
To start off: Maine is an obvious 1D, 1R, unless an independent with enough clout runs.
New Hampshire is an obvious 1D, 1R.
Vermont is an obvious 1D, unless an independent with enough clout runs.
Rhode Island is another obvious 1D.
I assume that the each voter has 3 votes thing is dependent on there being 4 members elected. People would have one less vote than the number of members elected, unless it's a single-member district, with people having one vote.
In two-seaters, you still have 3 people in a runoff, and in a single-member district, only 2 people in a runoff.
Yeah that was the idea. Reapportionment is not set in stone. I've seen a lot of different projections, so I think how thoroughly the census was conducted in each state will make a difference.
Also if the annual census estimates were wrong then the projections could be fairly off.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.