If it were up to the states....? (Abortion) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:45:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  If it were up to the states....? (Abortion) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If it were up to the states....? (Abortion)  (Read 7565 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: February 19, 2005, 07:02:24 PM »

If it happened as the map suggests how bad would that be? People who live in the anti-abortion states would be, at most, a one day drive from a state where abortion is legal. Someone in need of an abortion could still get one.

And everyone who needs an abortion always has a car, and 2 days to drive to get one?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2005, 02:04:52 AM »

If that map is accurate some new restrictions are needed urgently...

How will you pay for the increased cost to society of forcing women to be baby making machines against their will?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2005, 05:13:36 AM »

What the f*** are you on about? This isn't more social darwinist bullsh*t is it?

If (I stress the "if") that map is accurate, a majority of babies in D.C are aborted. How the f*** can you possibily justify that and still remain a human being?

So you want to over double the birth rate in DC by forcing women to be baby making machines against their will? How the  are you going to pay for that? The increased cost of raising children no one wants, the cost of foster parents, jails, and to the environment?  that sh**t.

By forcing women to go through 9 months of pregnancy, and then decide whether to try to give up the child, you are pro-slavery.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2005, 05:15:44 AM »
« Edited: April 24, 2005, 05:22:09 AM by jfern »



The babies that die don't have anyone to defend them do they?

Abortion on demand should be illegal.

So if a condom breaks or birth control fails, you should be forced to go through 9 months of pregancy, then a painful childbirth, followed by having to give up the child that you can't afford to raise? You hate freedom.

How would you pay for the addition cost to society of your ramming your views down other people's throats by denying them control to their own body? Or have are you just following an irrational emotional reaction and have you not thought about the consequences?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.