CBS/YouGov: Clinton +4 (OH), Clinton +4 (WI), Clinton +8 (PA) (user search)

OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God

Posts: 4,833

« on: October 09, 2016, 08:45:42 AM »

I'm wary on WI, but I'll take it!

Logged

OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God

Posts: 4,833

« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2016, 09:47:18 AM »

the feingold numbers are creepy.

and makes me wonder the whole poll....hillary outrunning feingold in wi?

The Ohio and Pennsylvania numbers look plausible but the Wisconsin numbers are definitely GOP skewed

IMO, I think PA Senate numbers don't look plausible either. The other PA poll showed a race that seemed more consistent.

Logged

OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God

Posts: 4,833

« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2016, 11:22:51 AM »

the feingold numbers are creepy.

and makes me wonder the whole poll....hillary outrunning feingold in wi?

The Ohio and Pennsylvania numbers look plausible but the Wisconsin numbers are definitely GOP skewed

IMO, I think PA Senate numbers don't look plausible either. The other PA poll showed a race that seemed more consistent.

Quinnipiac showed Toomey up 8 and Monmouth had McGinty and Toomey tied as well, so no.

Toomey up by 8 is an outlier. Why did you mention that result?

Logged

Pages: [1]

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 08, 2024, 03:15:51 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more