Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 09:51:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would pussygate have been more damaging to trump against another democrat?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 76

Author Topic: Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate?  (Read 3770 times)
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
« on: May 18, 2019, 03:04:46 PM »

That type of slander would have sunk any other candidate. That's what made DONALD JOHN TRUMP truly strong, in contrast to Slick Mittens and the guy who got captured in Vietnam.

His own recorded words are slander?

And a guy who abused his privilege and made up a fake excuse about his feet hurting to avoid fighting in Vietnam is stronger than someone who voluntarily went and stayed while being tortured despite the opportunity to avoid both with his privilege?
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2019, 03:08:24 PM »
« Edited: May 18, 2019, 03:24:53 PM by KYWildman »

Doubt it. The ambiguous wording of "they let you do it" makes for a pretty polarizing response. If you are inclined to believe Trump is a rapist, they you think he's a rapist. If you're not, then you don't.

“I don’t even wait” is not ambiguous, he clearly means he doesn’t wait for their consent. “They let you do it” is just his twisted narcissistic brain believing the women are “letting” him do it because they are too scared or uncomfortable to actively resist.

And then there’s the dozen plus women who confirmed just that.

What ridiculous mental gymnastics, what he said was clear and disgusting. Period. It’s utter insanity that anyone would defend it, and the fact that they wouldn’t for anyone but this man in particular boggles the mind.

Besides, he didn’t even use that line of defense. He never even tried to argue he was talking about consensual encounters. He just said it was “locker room talk.” Then after “apologizing” for it, a year later he was claiming he never said it all, Orwellian style.

The man is indefensible in everything he does.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.