if the world could vote (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 03:18:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  if the world could vote (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: if the world could vote  (Read 3198 times)
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« on: October 17, 2008, 12:50:51 PM »


Obama getting 82% of the US vote? LOL

and LOL @ McCain getting 100% (ie both votes) from Burkina Faso.

I wouldn't have guessed that there were two IP addresses in Burkina Faso.



"Now, starvin' Marvin, these are hors d'oeuvres.  These are what we eat before we eat to make us hungry."

"Umm, click?"

"Bad Starvin Marvin!  Those are my appetizers.  Get your own."

"Click.  Click.  'mm' bbp.  Click!"
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2008, 12:54:49 PM »

Check it out Lunar.  Results from Syria:

Obama 100%
McCain 0%.

I smell an excellent campaign ad in the works for John McCain.   Smiley
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2008, 12:59:11 PM »

Kazakhstan:

Obama:  82%
McCain:  18%


Must be all those Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan that swung the vote so heavily for Obama there. 

Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2008, 02:28:46 PM »

Damn near all 394 of them.  Wink

And you gotta love that name:   "Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of" 
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2008, 02:33:56 PM »

This link is better than The Onion, actually.  Outside of China (The People's Republic of), no one mistakes The Onion as anything other than entertainment. 

I just cast the 89437th vote, by the way, from the United States of America, where Barack Obama has a commanding 64.2 percent lead over John McCain.  Cheesy

Go Barry!  It's your birthday!
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2008, 06:44:14 PM »
« Edited: October 17, 2008, 06:46:32 PM by angus »

Hey, if I could vote in the British, German, Canadian etc. (countries I like) elections, I'd be fine with letting them vote in mine.



But you won't vote in theirs.  Neither will they in yours.  That's the paradox, really.  "If the world could vote..." then it would be voting for something not called "President of the United States."  Similarly, if a person is voting for "The president of Country X" then one can assume that the person under discussion has the right to vote in Country X.  It's fun exercise, but it's meaningless, at least until we get some form of World government and invent some office and some suffrage criteria, it's meaningless.  And certainly not a scientific poll.  What's funny is that all these posters are taking it so seriously.  Using it to settle arguments.  "Ummm, the Chasidic Jews are the most reliably Republican demographic out there."  "Oh, yeah?  Well, the shellfish-eating reform Jews used to like Liebermann (before he became a mouthpiece for McCain, that is).  Now we don't like him either."  "Oh, yeah, well apparently Venezuela likes McCain better than Peru."

We really don't know from this link whether Venezuela likes McCain better than Peru, do we?  And of course the Chassids are the most reliable Republicans out there, but that really isn't very relevant, since it's almost certain that Obama will win all the electoral votes from New York.  A better question would be, "Who ya hopin' will win?"  Have that translated into 103 languages, and get some representative polling, and weight appropriately, knowing, for example, that the average Burkina Faso resident neither owns a computer nor knows who is running for U.S. President.  Whether such weighting should account for whether a person gives a rats ass who becomes the next president when he's wondering where his next meal is coming from is a matter for debate, of course, but it's important not to take straw polls too seriously. 

Now, Tender Branson's at least looking at people who own telephones.  Unfortunately, they're going for folks who have more pimples than bills, and who are at that age where they masturbate more times in one day than I've voted in my entire lifetime, but at least they're trying.

It's all in good fun.  I'm just ripping the folks taking such internet straw poll results (about a question that poses an existential paradox) as evidence of anything other than the fact that the 304 Macedonians who actually own computers have heard of Obama, and the 2 Burkina Faso residents who actually own computers have apparently heard of McCain.  Lest anyone take any of it too seriously.

Well, that and I'm bored.  I should probably find something constructive to do.  We all should.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.