Which of the big three Republicans would have done worst in 2008? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 09:17:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which of the big three Republicans would have done worst in 2008? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Which of the big three Republicans would have done worst in 2008?  (Read 2394 times)
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,015
Greece


« on: June 12, 2011, 03:37:04 AM »

Everyone of them had their glaring weaknesses.

McCain was clueless about the economy, too old and erratic. The Sarah Palin pick must be one of the worst decisions made by a presidential candidate ever.

Romney was a phony and a flip floper. Not to mention that running as a millionaire businessman during the Lehmann Brothers collapse would be terrible optics.

Huckabee was too socially conservative for the general electorate, too fiscally liberal for his base, and a horrible fundraiser. 

Overall, we'll never know.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,015
Greece


« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2011, 02:56:03 PM »

Huck was and is a rapture right conservative, and didn't hide it at well at all in 08. He couldn't "pass" to many non-evengelical swing voters the way W did. Huck would've crashed hard IMHO.

Indeed. But he was much more charismatic and likable than the other two and his economic populism would have played well, especially against a TARP voting senator like Obama.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 8 queries.