Congressional Special Elections Results Thread (OLD, PLEASE UNSTICKY)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 01:33:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Congressional Special Elections Results Thread (OLD, PLEASE UNSTICKY)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 ... 69
Author Topic: Congressional Special Elections Results Thread (OLD, PLEASE UNSTICKY)  (Read 202211 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,809


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #675 on: April 11, 2017, 09:42:04 PM »

Well Estes' margin just narrowed to 5.7% with 88% reporting. Appears the Election Day vote in Sedgwick was decisively more Democratic than the ED vote elsewhere.

Percentage lead has dropped a bit, but raw vote lead hasn't really. Consistent with an ED split in Sedgwick.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #676 on: April 11, 2017, 09:43:35 PM »

All things considered, this was a pretty good result for the blue team. It's not necessarily indicative of anything by itself, though. If, however, Democrats win GA-06 and MT-AL (or win one and come very close in the other), then you could probably make the argument that this is part of a larger pattern, and that there's a massive anti-Trump backlash brewing.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #677 on: April 11, 2017, 09:44:43 PM »

All things considered, this was a pretty good result for the blue team. It's not necessarily indicative of anything by itself, though. If, however, Democrats win GA-06 and MT-AL (or win one and come very close in the other), then you could probably make the argument that this is part of a larger pattern, and that there's a massive anti-Trump backlash brewing.

The issue, of course, is that even ni 2014  kansas was embarrassingly close for the republicans.

The bigger issue, also, is that a lot can happen till 2018, especially with all these war drums.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,387
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #678 on: April 11, 2017, 09:45:59 PM »

only the trolls are gloating, whoever knows anything about this stuff is quite serious.

Special elections are special. Turnout was by all accounts abysmal.

Also, what is happening in kansas is NOT happening in other states. The state is in the midst of a finance crisis, with the guy running today directly tied to it.

All politics is local.


Remember kansas during the 2014 national gop wave?

Everyone says this when their side got shorted.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #679 on: April 11, 2017, 09:46:49 PM »

AP calls the race for Estes.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,477
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #680 on: April 11, 2017, 09:49:05 PM »

✓ Estes (R) - 57,954 - 52.0%
Thompson (D) - 51,494 - 46.2%
Rockhold (L) 1,911 - 1.7%

94% reporting (580 of 620 precincts)

What a pathetic showing by the Libertarian. I expected them to peel off more disaffected Republicans.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,092
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #681 on: April 11, 2017, 09:49:34 PM »

✓ Estes (R) - 57,954 - 52.0%
Thompson (D) - 51,494 - 46.2%
Rockhold (L) 1,911 - 1.7%

94% reporting (580 of 620 precincts)

What a pathetic showing by the Libertarian. I expected them to peel off more disaffected Republicans.

Disaffected Republicans just end up not voting in these types of elections.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #682 on: April 11, 2017, 09:50:02 PM »

✓ Estes (R) - 57,954 - 52.0%
Thompson (D) - 51,494 - 46.2%
Rockhold (L) 1,911 - 1.7%

94% reporting (580 of 620 precincts)

What a pathetic showing by the Libertarian. I expected them to peel off more disaffected Republicans.

Disaffected Republicans just end up not voting in these types of elections.

So about +6 in the end. Amazing.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #683 on: April 11, 2017, 09:50:37 PM »

FWIW, Pompeo never won by less than 30 points. Estes looks likely to win by no more than 6. That's a 12 point swing... more than enough to flip the House.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #684 on: April 11, 2017, 09:50:54 PM »


what spin? this is a district Trump won by nearly 30.

wow you guys averted complete disaster in a district you had no business losing. great job.
Logged
Thomas Jackson
ghostmonkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 710


Political Matrix
E: 8.77, S: 8.79

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #685 on: April 11, 2017, 09:53:33 PM »


what spin? this is a district Trump won by nearly 30.

wow you guys averted complete disaster in a district you had no business losing. great job.

A Trump will win it again by 30 points.

Estes isn't Trump.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #686 on: April 11, 2017, 09:53:51 PM »

Do people forget kansas 2014?

This state should not be considered any sort of microcosm.

GA-6 far more interesting.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,678
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #687 on: April 11, 2017, 09:53:54 PM »


If the GOP actually lost this race...they're the ones that would need a LOT of spin spin spin.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,477
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #688 on: April 11, 2017, 09:54:24 PM »

✓ Estes (R) - 57,954 - 52.0%
Thompson (D) - 51,494 - 46.2%
Rockhold (L) 1,911 - 1.7%

94% reporting (580 of 620 precincts)

What a pathetic showing by the Libertarian. I expected them to peel off more disaffected Republicans.

Disaffected Republicans just end up not voting in these types of elections.

Well, the Libertarian candidates got >4% in both the Senate and Gubernatorial races here in 2014. Alas, turnout was pretty bad in this race, so you're probably right.
Logged
GlobeSoc
The walrus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,979


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #689 on: April 11, 2017, 09:55:00 PM »

Could someone construct a swing map of the counties?
Logged
JMT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,137


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #690 on: April 11, 2017, 09:55:08 PM »

Wow, will Estes won this obviously should not have been this close. Does this set up Thomson to run against Estes again in 2018? Or for a different office? I imagine Dems will think highly of Thompson after this
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #691 on: April 11, 2017, 09:55:46 PM »

Think of it this way - this is like if Republicans gave Democrats a run for their money in Maryland's 8th district, currently represented by Flawless Beautiful Curly Haired Jaime Raskin.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #692 on: April 11, 2017, 09:56:15 PM »

Sad to see so many people on Twitter just seeing this as "DNC screws up another race"
Logged
Kantakouzenos
Rookie
**
Posts: 74


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #693 on: April 11, 2017, 09:57:00 PM »

Seeing as the Dems did quite well in this race, could this be indicative of what happens in Georgia and Montana coming up?  I know these elections can be pretty local, but this certainly isn't the first special election dems have done better in so far.
Logged
Thomas Jackson
ghostmonkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 710


Political Matrix
E: 8.77, S: 8.79

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #694 on: April 11, 2017, 09:57:03 PM »

Democrats poured MILLIONS into this seat. MILLIONS.

Republicans didn't.

Estes sleepwalked through the campaign.

"Estes was a particularly weak candidate. As a member of Gov. Sam Brownback’s administration, he scored a 2 of 10 score on candidate strength."

Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #695 on: April 11, 2017, 09:57:44 PM »

Think of it this way - this is like if Republicans gave Democrats a run for their money in Maryland's 8th district, currently represented by Flawless Beautiful Curly Haired Jaime Raskin.

If maryland currently had a historic budget deficit that forced closures at schools and credit ratings to get heavily downgraded, while also having anemic economic growth, a very liberal republican could end up doing decent against someone directly tied to the mess.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #696 on: April 11, 2017, 09:58:51 PM »

All things considered, this was a pretty good result for the blue team. It's not necessarily indicative of anything by itself, though. If, however, Democrats win GA-06 and MT-AL (or win one and come very close in the other), then you could probably make the argument that this is part of a larger pattern, and that there's a massive anti-Trump backlash brewing.

The issue, of course, is that even ni 2014  kansas was embarrassingly close for the republicans.

The bigger issue, also, is that a lot can happen till 2018, especially with all these war drums.

That's why I said that we should wait for GA-06 and MT-AL to determine if there's a larger trend here, or if it's just a matter of Brownback's unpopularity.

Btw, am I crazy for thinking that Democrats have a shot at the gubernatorial race here in 2018?
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,678
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #697 on: April 11, 2017, 09:59:07 PM »
« Edited: April 11, 2017, 10:00:42 PM by AKCreative »

Democrats poured MILLIONS into this seat. MILLIONS.

Republicans didn't.

Estes sleepwalked through the campaign.

"Estes was a particularly weak candidate. As a member of Gov. Sam Brownback’s administration, he scored a 2 of 10 score on candidate strength."



Uhh...no they didn't.   National Democrats didn't invest in this election at all.

KS Dems did a small amount but not "millions"

The RCCC did invest millions in this race.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #698 on: April 11, 2017, 10:00:01 PM »

Democrats poured MILLIONS into this seat. MILLIONS.

Republicans didn't.


Estes sleepwalked through the campaign.

"Estes was a particularly weak candidate. As a member of Gov. Sam Brownback’s administration, he scored a 2 of 10 score on candidate strength."



now you're just lying. you're confusing this with GA-06.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,387
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #699 on: April 11, 2017, 10:00:41 PM »


what spin? this is a district Trump won by nearly 30.

wow you guys averted complete disaster in a district you had no business losing. great job.

A Trump will win it again by 30 points.

Estes isn't Trump.

Yes, Trump is by every measure a far, far worse candidate.

Blaming this on Estes is profoundly obtuse.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 ... 69  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 9 queries.