SENATE BILL: De-Registration Act (Vetoed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 10:09:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: De-Registration Act (Vetoed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: De-Registration Act (Vetoed)  (Read 5289 times)
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


« on: January 14, 2011, 03:28:11 PM »

As a former RG, my problem with this is the complication of region changing laws.  The RG cannot simply delete the record of the de-registered.  A separate list of de-registered accounts would have to be maintained, with the date of last region change.

I would like to hear from the current RG on this.  Hans, any thoughts?
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2011, 11:39:21 AM »

Why hasn't this gotten to my desk?
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2011, 11:38:18 AM »

VETO

I raised my concerns with this bill early in the debate.  The current Registrar General shared my concerns:

As a former RG, my problem with this is the complication of region changing laws.  The RG cannot simply delete the record of the de-registered.  A separate list of de-registered accounts would have to be maintained, with the date of last region change.

I would like to hear from the current RG on this.  Hans, any thoughts?

Fritz you're right. When it is possible to De-Register, then the RG must make a extra list for all who are de-registrated. In this list must stand all dates of region change and when he left Atlasia.

I think there is no need for a De-Registration. Who wants to leave Atlasia need only 3 times not to vote.
However, I'm open for a law like this, but it must be simple as possible.

It is my feeling that the final version of the bill failed to address these concerns.  This makes the job of the RG unnecessarily complex, and as a former RG this is a concern very near and dear to me.  Already the RG must keep track of number of elections missed, and the date of the last regional move.

I think we made a step in the right direction with the third constitution, having de-registration occur after 3 missed elections rather than 4.  I really don't see why it is a big deal to have to wait 4-6 months to have your name removed from a list that you signed up to be on.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.