Gallup Some make sense, others don't..... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 08, 2024, 11:19:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  Gallup Some make sense, others don't..... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Gallup Some make sense, others don't.....  (Read 2495 times)
okstate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 383


« on: November 06, 2006, 12:10:11 AM »

So....

McCaskill +4
Tester +9
Menendez +10
Whitehouse +3
Corker +3
Allen +3

?

I guess they aren't ridiculous.

The Montana result clearly contradicts Rasmussen, Zogby and Mason-Dixon.

But the result in Missouri looks pretty good. It's about the same as M-D, Rasmussen, Zogby, and Survey USA.

The Tennessee race is looking more like maybe Mason-Dixon is the outfit with the wrong result here, since Gallup shows it closer (and Rasmussen has shown 4 points of tightening)

Virginia's result looks a bit more out there. Clearly M-D, Zogby, and Rasmussen are in close agreement. I'd like to see what SurveyUSA has to say here. If they have Webb up I think that shows he clearly has a bit of a lead (and definitely the momentum). But if they show Allen up, that throws the contest into a lot more doubt, becuase you'd have good pollsters lined up on both sides.

I personally think Gallup's NJ result looks good when compared to others.

Rhode Island I'm less sure of. Mason-Dixon still looks a bit out there, but Gallup definitely is showing tightening, too.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.