Hillary faces protests @ NH rally & keeps reporters behind a rope

[heatmaster]

Why is she ducking and weaving, bending over backwards to avoid press questions? If it isn't Benghazi, if it isn't emailgate, if it isn't the Clinton Foundation fundraising irregularities & activities that are the problems. Then why isn't Hillary emerging from her cocoon? Does she realize that in the full glare of press inquisition she will wilt under the weight of her rationales, excuses, half - truths, language parsing in Clintonian fashion? Folks like the Clinton for the entertainment value and are very likely not willing to submit to another era of psycho drama, been there, done that.  Folks overestimate Hillary's appeal. She knows this, that's why she won't go before the media, her lies & inconsistencies will catch her. She must understand this, in spite of her denials to the contrary. She will have to play by the rules of the game, that everyone else observes to stay in the game. When votes are at stake, then she will cry uncle😉

[heatmaster]

The question will be answered then by this Republican, by cleaning her server, and only handing over those emails that are not viewed as politically damaging,  Hillary uses the rationale that she didn't break the law, she didn't violate the spirit of the law and has the gall to presume folks are so dumb and addled to buy her cock and bull crap. She forgets one thing, the burden of innocence doesn't lie with us Republicans. We didn't wipe our server like we were trying to hide anything. Being a smart ass about the whole thing, using the rationale "I didn't do anything wrong and you can't prove it" won't wash. The simple truth, is Hillary thinks she has gotten away with it. When she hasn't, the email affair and her cleaning her server will dog her throughout the campaign. Republicans don't have to prove anything, but Hillary has to prove she wasn't trying to cover up stuff, she hasn't done a good job so far. Her negatives are rising, her favorability ratings are going down, people view her as dishonest. So if she thought she has gotten away with things, then she should think again, she must know as long as there are Republicans and Fox news, as well as swift boat 527 groups to keep the pot bubbling she won't be able to hide. Republicans don't really have to throw the book at her in a legal sense. She saw to that, by wiping her server clean. They can merely point out the optics. Remember what happened to John Kerry in 2004? Unhappy days are around the corner for Hillary.

[heatmaster]

In response to mds32 question, yes!!!. Doesn't mean Hillary will answer or try to answer. Usual stonewalling and obfuscation will function. She won't answer questions where her credibility continues to take a pummeling😉

[heatmaster]

Bedstuy is using the usual Democratic talking points: in fact you are factually wrong about President Clinton and Whitewater, the report established that President Clinton had lied under oath and he had to plea bargain in exchange for a six year bar on his law licence. The Whitewater investigation "didn't find any evidence" of illegal activity or wrong doing; that is your best defense? That's your excuse? That's your rationale?  That's like the crook who was nailed and is guilty as sin, because of legal loopholes, gets off Scott free! "Wuzn't me, because there's no evidence", notice same line of Defense is being used on Benghazi,  by the way, the final Benghazi report isn't due for release until just a month before the November 2016 elections, so the voters can make up there minds about what actually did happen. Like to see Hillary spin her way out that one. You Democrats are all the same, playing the same old "she'll game" now you see it, now you don't" ...."believe us, don't believe those nasty Republicans and certainly not your own lying eyes". There is now an issue of credibility at stake here, The Clinton's have no credibility on emailgate, Clinton Foundation fundraising irregularities in fundraising, certainly not on server issue,  wiping it clean suggests she was hiding something,  no evidence of wrong doing? That's your defense?  Those are your talking points? Oh dear! Did you ever hear of the optics?  Well certainly the optics concerning this whole process doesn't show Hillary in a positive light. Her rating regarding trustworthiness is down, her dishonesty ratings are up! She might be a shoo- in for the Democratic nomination,  not surprising, considering it's in a echo chamber situation. But the real world awaits you and your explanations Hillary. So yes Bedstuy, you and many of your ilk can rely on the usual reliable of "No evidence", but most folks don't use your standards to weigh a person's fitness for the Presidency. Hillary has yet to give an explanation on why she wiped her email server clean and her stock answer to that particular question is woefully inadequate, maybe she didn't want information that would have provided "evidence" of wrong doing, maybe there was evidence of influence peddling visa vi Hillary Clinton's position as Secretary of State and the Clinton Foundation, but again there's "no evidence", not guilty? She behaved in a guilty fashion in the way she removed the "evidence". You see bedstuy, this is what we are left with, no explanation and certainly no "corroborative evidence" to prove she wasn't up to no good. This "evidence" thing cuts both ways. So bring it on dude.  But honestly, if that is the best you can come up with, using the "No evidence" line, well I certainly don't think it's gonna wash.  How do you control the formation of public opinion? How do you control the way that perception's have hardened? You and many of your fellow Democrats are in for a nasty surprise! Hillary owes the public a proper explanation, all she does is trot out the likes of Lanny Davis to spin her case. She hides away from the people who are asking the questions.  Why?