Sec. Clinton wins praise from international diplomats

[Ogre Mage]

In her debut on the world stage as SoS, she has made a good first impression:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/07/AR2009030701765.html?sid=ST2009030800003


And from the Financial Times Brusselsblog:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Verily]

But some intern somewhere misspelled something in Russian, so clearly that gets all the press attention. (Although actually the organization that really seemed to love covering that story was the BBC; not mindless enough for the American media, I suppose.)

[Platypus]

to be honest, don't they have to say stuff like that, if they're diplomats? At least at first...

[GMantis]

to be honest, don't they have to say stuff like that, if they're diplomats? At least at first...

Yes, this is the usual diplomatic talk. And there is a grace period.

[Ogre Mage]

to be honest, don't they have to say stuff like that, if they're diplomats? At least at first...

Yes, this is the usual diplomatic talk. And there is a grace period.

If this were the U.K., I would agree.  However, I would not assume that the Russian and French Foreign Ministers are going to automatically praise the U.S.

One can contrast Russian Foreign Minister's Lavrov's first meeting with Clinton vs. his first meeting with Condi Rice in 2005.  It did not sound like a grace period.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/06/AR2009030600428_pf.html

As far as I know, Lavrov did not say he had a wonderful personal relationship with Rice.