Politico: The Case for Mitt `16 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 05:30:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Politico: The Case for Mitt `16 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Politico: The Case for Mitt `16  (Read 3761 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: July 03, 2014, 06:31:52 PM »

Romney got 47% of the vote, so I fail to see how it's a moral victory that 45% think we'd be better off if he was president...
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2014, 08:01:26 PM »

In all seriousness, "Mitt '16" sounds a lot like "Kerry '08". I seem to recall the media taking the latter very seriously as well, and consistently claiming that Kerry was "doing what he needs to do" in order to run again in 2008.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2014, 08:27:05 PM »

In all seriousness, "Mitt '16" sounds a lot like "Kerry '08". I seem to recall the media taking the latter very seriously as well, and consistently claiming that Kerry was "doing what he
needs to do" in order to run again in 2008.

Hmmm. I don't know why, but that sounds awfully familiar.

I like your thinking!  That line sounds exactly like what Hillary is "doing" right now.

The difference being that neither Kerry nor Romney held/hold overwhelming leads in both the primary and the general election.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2014, 12:52:06 AM »

What states could Mitt possibly win against Hillary Clinton that he couldn't win against Obama?

Hillary might lose Colorado, but she can easily make that up with NC/MO.

The only two polls that have included Romney show Hillary beating him by a bigger margin than Obama did in 2012.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2014, 03:39:45 PM »

I hope Politico got all the clicks they were hoping for. The phrase "damaged goods" doesn't even begin to describe Romney.
It describes every single Democratic candidate to an even greater degree. Fact is the next president will be a Republican, and Mitt is the best choice for the Republican party.

LOL

Let me guess, you also thought there would be a Romney landslide in 2012?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2014, 10:52:13 PM »

The Republicans have a stronger field this cycle, a lot better than the jokers that played 2012.  That, along, with Hillary Clinton repeatedly shooting herself in the foot with her gaffes, might eliminate the need for Romney to run again.  Romney wouldn't be able to do much because he's a has-been.  Jeb Bush has a stronger chance, because the name of Bush is not near as toxic as it was in 2008.  Plus, Jeb is unlike his elder brother.  After what a lot of Americans view as the worst presidency since World War II under Obama, the name Bush may actually sound pretty appealing and even comforting.  There's no need for Romney to run.  The GOP can do quite well without him.

lmao.

Please enlighten us on how Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Jeb Bush are strong contenders. Maybe in the fantasy world/bubble of Faux Noise where people honestly thought Mittens was going to win in 2012 (despite every poll saying otherwise), the same people who are still probably looking at the numbers in Ohio. Lol

If the "most electable" Republican couldn't unseat the Kenyan Marxist socialist antichrist martian communist Nazi Barack Hussein Obama, there's no way Willard is going to defeat Hillary Clinton. #CaseClosed

Don't forget that Hillary lost to the same "Kenyan Marxist socialist antichrist martian communist Nazi", and keep in mind that Hillary is such a good candidate that she needs to constantly be bloated up by feminists and the media in order to appear viable.

Well as we all know, it's much easier for a Kenyan Marxist socialist antichrist martian communist Nazi to win a Democratic primary as opposed to a general election.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.