SENATE BILL: The Judiciary Reform Amendment of 2012 (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 07:56:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: The Judiciary Reform Amendment of 2012 (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: The Judiciary Reform Amendment of 2012 (Failed)  (Read 3659 times)
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
« on: July 12, 2012, 11:14:09 PM »
Is the CJO an elected position in any region? If so, that would be an automatic reason for me to oppose this.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2012, 10:55:37 AM »
Quote from: Senator Scott on July 13, 2012, 10:52:45 AM
Quote from: Ebowed on July 13, 2012, 03:27:14 AM
Quote from: Senator Scott on July 12, 2012, 11:30:07 PM
Either way, the Supreme Court should be more involved in the game

Increasing the number of people involved isn't necessarily going to do that.  The Court can only work with what it is given.

True, but court cases themselves could become much more involving if there are more justices participating in them.
I would say during the last 2 cases we had, people were very interested and involved in the cases. I think the "problem" is that there aren't enough cases, not that there aren't enough justices.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.