Iowa <3 Gay Marriage

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

no surprise.  As I've stated before, there is a reason why the New Testament uses the Genesis story of Lot in Sodom as a picture of the deliverance of believers during the endtimes.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

no surprise.  As I've stated before, there is a reason why the New Testament uses the Genesis story of Lot in Sodom as a picture of the deliverance of believers during the endtimes.

If gays can get married and enjoy civil rights while simultaneously advancing the Rapture and the return of Christ for people who believe that to be the outcome, then it becomes a win-win situation in the eyes of both, no?

no, because in the end, the sexual immoral will be condemned.

But, hey, I was simply remarking why I am not surprised.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

no surprise.  As I've stated before, there is a reason why the New Testament uses the Genesis story of Lot in Sodom as a picture of the deliverance of believers during the endtimes.

If gays can get married and enjoy civil rights while simultaneously advancing the Rapture and the return of Christ for people who believe that to be the outcome, then it becomes a win-win situation in the eyes of both, no?

no, because in the end, the sexual immoral will be condemned.

But, hey, I was simply remarking why I am not surprised.

do you think divorce should be legal?

this is not a question of legality, rather it's a question of forced recognition.

your question further misses the mark in that the bible itself gives legitmate reasons for divorce

But, as I stated, I only pointed out why I was not surprised.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

no surprise.  As I've stated before, there is a reason why the New Testament uses the Genesis story of Lot in Sodom as a picture of the deliverance of believers during the endtimes.

If gays can get married and enjoy civil rights while simultaneously advancing the Rapture and the return of Christ for people who believe that to be the outcome, then it becomes a win-win situation in the eyes of both, no?

no, because in the end, the sexual immoral will be condemned.

But, hey, I was simply remarking why I am not surprised.

do you think divorce should be legal?

this is not a question of legality, rather it's a question of forced recognition.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

no surprise.  As I've stated before, there is a reason why the New Testament uses the Genesis story of Lot in Sodom as a picture of the deliverance of believers during the endtimes.

If gays can get married and enjoy civil rights while simultaneously advancing the Rapture and the return of Christ for people who believe that to be the outcome, then it becomes a win-win situation in the eyes of both, no?

no, because in the end, the sexual immoral will be condemned.

But, hey, I was simply remarking why I am not surprised.

do you think divorce should be legal?

this is not a question of legality, rather it's a question of forced recognition.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

no surprise.  As I've stated before, there is a reason why the New Testament uses the Genesis story of Lot in Sodom as a picture of the deliverance of believers during the endtimes.

If gays can get married and enjoy civil rights while simultaneously advancing the Rapture and the return of Christ for people who believe that to be the outcome, then it becomes a win-win situation in the eyes of both, no?

no, because in the end, the sexual immoral will be condemned.

But, hey, I was simply remarking why I am not surprised.

do you think divorce should be legal?

this is not a question of legality, rather it's a question of forced recognition.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

no, because in the end, the sexual immoral will be condemned.

Shouldn't that be the 'sexually immoral'?

I can't really see how one can condemn someone accidentally pronging the wrong hole if one can't even talk about it correctly.  I mean, arguably a hole is a hole, but by contrast words really have to follow the rules in order to be useful.

consider it an aborted adverb left in adjective mode...better known as a typo

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

What the hell happened to this thread?

a clot of homosexuals weren't happy with my lack of a surprised reaction to the headlines

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

What the hell happened to this thread?

a clot of homosexuals weren't happy with my lack of a surprised reaction to the headlines

Is "clot" the word used to describe a group of homosexuals? A school of fish; a herd of cattle; a clot of homosexuals?

Learn something new everyday!

well, considering their white blood cell count is usually low due to their wayward behavior, "an ooze of homosexuals" wouldn't make much sense.  but HIV does increase the risk of blood clots, hence "a clot of homosexuals".